Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA_scientist
We said the 20% of your bankroll because we wanted to make sure everyone wasnt going all in the last event.We werent trying to put everyone behind the leader at a disadvantage
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA_scientist
We said the 20% of your bankroll because we wanted to make sure everyone wasnt going all in the last event.We werent trying to put everyone behind the leader at a disadvantage
I'm not going to vote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LudoCain
You have too you're part of the 10 in the contest.
If we dont agree it'll have to say 20% on your bankroll becuase we didnt define if the 20% stayed the same .
I want you to vote .
I don't want it to seem like I'm biased. Since I'm one of 10, without my vote there can't be a tie. Whatever the majority decision comes out as is cool with Me.
I like a flat $20 personally.
Congrats to Ludo, BTW.
You're the man.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LudoCain
I just dont want anyone mad
Zy me wiseman voted for 20 dollars or 20% if your over 100
MMAscientist voted 20% no matter what
We need 5 more voters to chine in
SPX ,ZAK,high5 ,Mike, poopoo
Thanks, SPX. Like I said I really just got lucky tonight for the most part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPX
thats not one of the choices
stay with us SPX
Your +17.66u in the UFC isn't luck.Quote:
Originally Posted by LudoCain
Apparently we have something in common.
It is when dealing with a card like this full of relative nobodies even if you watched the show(which I did), and guys who were thought to be on the brink of being shot(Leben), or somehow still convincing people they have what it takes to win fights with mid level fighters(Jardine). Tonight was full of surprises in a way, and no surprise at all in others(alot of favorites winning tonight). all in all I stayed away for the most part because I honestly had no way to predict any kind of viable variance for alot of these fights.
I was having a really difficult time coming up with logical outcomes here based on only being able to see one fight for some of these guys and multiple ones that were nothing special for some of the others. Thats why I stayed mostly with guys I've seen before and could actually match things up between. I think we all learned a valuable lesson here: never bet against the deaf wrestler unless he's fighting a brit in the UK or a former P4P stallwart.
New choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke
I've been a Hamill supporter for a while. I even bet on him against Jon Jones (which miraculously worked out for me). But I can't bet against Jardine. Really sad about this. He'll be cut.Quote:
Originally Posted by LudoCain
I dont think Jardine will be cut yet.
He's lost 4 in a row. As big of a fan as I am, he'll be cut. How could he not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thewiseman
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPX
Maybe he'll go fight in Strikeforce
I doubt he'll get cut. They don't pay him enough money to really worry about whether he stays or goes, and one less fighter for Strikeforce's infant 205lb division for cheap is a good sell to the UFC. Jardine has wins over Forrest, Chuck, Vera. He's only lost to Bonnar(back when he had a little respect), Houston(who everyone overlooked, including Keith), Wanderlei, Rampage, Bader, Thiago Silva, and now Hamill. Two future hall of famers, an up and coming star in the making, a guy who almost beat Rashad while injured. This loss is really the only one that sticks out as a blemish on his record for now. He'll be fine.
did we figure this 20% thing out or not?
I think you need to man up and call it, Luke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zY|
Well I say 20 dollars or 20% of your roll if its over 100 I just dont want anyone mad .
MMAscientist was the only one that said it should be 20% of your roll then he went and put two 20 dollar wagers in the WEC thread.I think he's got rocks in his head
Lets just go with 20 dollars or 20% of your roll if its over 100 ::handshake::