Your biggest suprises about the seedings

[Luke]

Every year the committee starts controversy when they put the seedings out. Who got in that shouldnt have, who got left out that should be in, who got a better seed than they deserved and who got a worse seed than they deserved?

Here is what I came up with :

How did Wisconsin even get in ? They had a 19-12 record ,no great wins and lost to everyone they should have .I see they got a 12 seed meaning they were one of the last teams in but I dont think they should have got in .

Arizona - see Wisconsin .

Michigan at 20-13 a 10 seed?? They should have never got in and they got a 10 seed? Two wins against Duke and UCLA three and a half months ago shouldnt propel you to a 10 seed when you go 10-11 your last 21 games.

Tennessee at 21-12 gets a 9 seed but Miss St wins SEC tourney by beating Tenn ,has two more wins at 23-12 and gets a 13 seed LOL .Either Tenn should be lower or Miss St should be higher. My take is Miss St should be higher after winning the SEC tournament

Missouri should have got a 2 seed over Oklahoma ,they won the Big 12 tourney and beat Oklahoma head to head but got a lower seed, are you kidding me?

Thats about all I got .Anyone agree or have anything to add? please post it

[Mr. IWS]

I agree that Arizona shouldnt have gotten in. I thought St. Marys or Penn St. should have gotten in over them.