WEC 48

[Luke]

http://www.investwithsports.com/phpB...ovski&start=15


I am very wise

Clearly I already knew that, hence the

"Which is why it would be interesting to see how the other books open if people could lay off destroying the bookmaker openers."

which is the same point I was about to make again.

Just say it .I thought you everything

I am very wise

[Luke]

Does anyone know where I can rewatch the Henderson-Cerrone fight? I cant seem to find it anywhere

[Ludo]

http://www.mma-core.com/videos/_Donald_ ... 97&tid=100


Who's your daddy?

[zY|]

Does anyone know where I can rewatch the Henderson-Cerrone fight? I cant seem to find it anywhere

I've got it in HD on my hard drive. No big deal.

[Luke]

Just say it .I thought you everything

I am very wise

taught not thought I must be tired

[Luke]

http://www.mma-core.com/videos/_Donald_Cerrone_vs_Benson_Henderson_WEC_43?vid=100 07097&tid=100


Who's your daddy?

Thanks

I looked there but only found one dead link.Guess I didnt look hard enough

[poopoo333]

2.5u on Jorgenson @-240
0.5u on Njokuani @+120
2u on Faber @+260

This is going to be a hit or miss night.

[MMA_scientist]

^^ Swinging fo the fences on Faber. I will probably drop .5 on Faber...
I am still searching for a bet though. I have ruled out Visher and Garcia (which I originally thought were bettable).

How is Mizugaki's takedown defense?

[poopoo333]

^^ Swinging fo the fences on Faber. I will probably drop .5 on Faber...
I am still searching for a bet though. I have ruled out Visher and Garcia (which I originally thought were bettable).

How is Mizugaki's takedown defense?

If I recall correctly, Jorgensen basically won via wrestling. I bet on Jorgensen as a dog in that fight.

Here are Mizugaki's WEC fight play by plays:

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-45 ... Play-21637

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-42 ... Play-19010

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-40 ... Play-16863

[MMA_scientist]

^^ I guess I am going to have to rule out that fight as well.

I got nothing on this card. I am probably going to abstain, with the exception of a tiny value bet on Faber.

[Ludo]

Yeah I think I'll just stick with what I have so far, maybe a bet on Jorgensen if anything else.

[Luke]

I think Henderson takes Cerrone again.In the first fight I dont think Cerrone won like some people .I clearly give him rounds 2&3 and also gave him round one which was closer.IMO the reason Cerrone won rounds 4 & 5 was not because he started figuring Henderson out it was because Henderson was tired.He spent a ton of energy in rounds
1-3 and didnt have enough gas in 4 and 5 for takedowns

Cerrone will never beat a wrestler imo because he has zero foot work.He walks flat footed and walks people down ,thats a big no no when fighting a wrestler because someone with no foot work makes it easy for a wrestler to successfully get takedowns because theres less guess work.All they have to do is shoot.

Cerrone couldnt submit Varner,couldnt submit Henderson and has no takedown defense.I'll be betting Henderson Saturday

[poopoo333]

Good luck Luke.

There are three +400 or better dogs on this card. Based on past WEC events, some big underdogs will probably win on Saturday. Putting a half unit on each will net a profit as long as one wins. hmmm. also, I am pretty sure Pettis took this fight on short notice.

[zY|]

I think Henderson takes Cerrone again.In the first fight I dont think Cerrone won like some people .I clearly give him rounds 2&3 and also gave him round one which was closer.IMO the reason Cerrone won rounds 4 & 5 was not because he started figuring Henderson out it was because Henderson was tired.He spent a ton of energy in rounds
1-3 and didnt have enough gas in 4 and 5 for takedowns

Cerrone will never beat a wrestler imo because he has zero foot work.He walks flat footed and walks people down ,thats a big no no when fighting a wrestler because someone with no foot work makes it easy for a wrestler to successfully get takedowns because theres less guess work.All they have to do is shoot.

Cerrone couldnt submit Varner,couldnt submit Henderson and has no takedown defense.I'll be betting Henderson Saturday

I could understand a Henderson bet, but Cerrone clearly won the first fight.

Even if you scored round 1 for Henderson (which btw not only makes you wrong but a bad person), the 5th round has to be a 10-8 by anyone's standards. It was total rape and domination. Draw at best for Henderson.

[SPX]

(which btw not only makes you wrong but a bad person)

Ha ha ha. . . That's funny.

Me, personally, I thought it was one of those fights that just could've gone either way. It was another Shogun/Machida or Penn/Edgar. A lot of people are going to say that one guy or the other "definitely" won, but really a lot of it comes down to how you score it and what you think is important. People score fights different ways because they give weight to different criteria.

[poopoo333]

I didn't even think the decision was controversial at all. 1-3 was Henderson, 4-5 was Cerrone.

[Ludo]

I gave rounds 3-4 to Cerrone clear as day, and rounds 1-2 to Henderson, round five I gave to Cerrone because he was the one who was still working, he locked in TWO subs in that round if I remember rightly, and he was winning the standup as well.

Side note, I changed my mind after I saw the lines out and put out a couple bets more.

1.6u to win 1u on Mizugaki
1.3u to win 1u on Garcia(American MMA> Japanese(korean in this case) MMA)

[Luke]

I didn't even think the decision was controversial at all. 1-3 was Henderson, 4-5 was Cerrone.

Exactly

At least one person can score a round

[zY|]

I didn't even think the decision was controversial at all. 1-3 was Henderson, 4-5 was Cerrone.

Exactly

At least one person can score a round

Back to boxing me thinks.

[Luke]

(which btw not only makes you wrong but a bad person)

Ha ha ha. . . That's funny.

Me, personally, I thought it was one of those fights that just could've gone either way. It was another Shogun/Machida or Penn/Edgar. A lot of people are going to say that one guy or the other "definitely" won, but really a lot of it comes down to how you score it and what you think is important. People score fights different ways because they give weight to different criteria.

Thats the thing you cant do that .You have to go by the rule book not by what you think is important