Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

  1. #1
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60

    Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    LAS VEGAS – Boxing wouldn’t be boxing without fighters talking smack before major events, but Floyd Mayweather took it to the next level in the run-up to the year’s biggest letdown, telling an outright lie and an absolute truth in the same breath.

    “I am the past, the present and the future of sports entertainment,” Mayweather said. “Once I get in the ring, I get great results.”

    Mayweather’s points victory over Shane Mosley at the MGM Grand Garden Arena on Saturday night was a masterful display of technical boxing and the work of a brilliant athlete at his peak.

    And it was boring as hell.

    The result, a near shutout of Mosley, Yahoo! Sports’ No. 3 pound-for-pound fighter coming into the bout, was indeed laced with greatness. The “entertainment,” though, was pretty non-existent. Outside of boxing purists, the fight generated as much excitement as a late-night infomercial.

    By the end of 12 lopsided rounds – except for a brief early flurry when Mosley rocked Mayweather with a pair of fierce shots to the chin and ear – you could almost hear a pin drop as a lifeless crowd got ready to shuffle off into the Vegas night.

    Of course there was plenty of predictable hype and hyperbole from Mayweather, plus his promoters Oscar De La Hoya and Richard Schaefer.

    “Mayweather is the best boxer on the planet,” De La Hoya said. “I don’t understand how anybody could not appreciate his skills.”

    Saturday night’s fight proved that there is only one contest involving Mayweather worth watching right now: the much-debated, politically-contentious and potentially record-breaking blockbuster against Manny Pacquiao that the sport desperately needs. Until that fight can be made, personality clashes, drug-testing arguments and other trivialities aside, there is nothing to be gained from witnessing Mayweather or Pacquiao taking on anyone else.

    They are too good, too far ahead of the pack, for any other bout to offer serious interest.

    What a letdown the past couple of months have been for boxing fans. First was the collapse of the superfight just when it was on the verge of being finalized, then two dull events involving the two men who should have been squaring off against each other.

    No one left the MGM buzzing with excitement. No one seemed to think $1,250 for a ringside seat was a great deal, and those who shelled out up to $65 for the pay-per-view telecast must have felt their cash could have been better invested in a couple more 12-packs.

    The biggest winner on this night could have been mixed martial arts, where unless Anderson Silva is in the cage, you pay your money and you get your action.

    Mosley failed to make this an enthralling spectacle, going into his shell in the middle rounds and never emerging from it. The Californian looked every one of his 38 years by the end, and landed only 92 punches all night.

    Mayweather did more to press the action than he has in the past, throwing right hands and coming close to knocking out Mosley late – yet it wasn’t enough to get fans on the edge of their seats.

    “Early on a lot of people were chanting for Mosley,” said Schaefer, CEO of Golden Boy Promotions. “There were a lot of people jealous of Mayweather. But by the end they were for Mayweather.”

    If allegiance had in fact shifted as strongly as Schaefer suggested, it was done pretty quietly. In comparison to recent fight nights involving Pacquiao at the same venue, when he crushed Ricky Hatton and Miguel Cotto, the vibe was remarkably subdued.

    The PPV numbers, likely to be released later this next week, will be solid and the projected gate of $11 million is expected to be in the top 10 of all time. But how many fringe fans will return for more of this? How many of those who don’t have a deep-rooted love of boxing will muster the will and the cash to see another big fight that is more technical than terrific.

    Boxing needs its superfight. And it needs it soon.
    http://sports.yahoo.com/box/news?slug=ro-floyd050210
    I heart cock

  2. #2
    10 year vet Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    30,071
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    cliff notes if you actually read this one
    2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP



  3. #3
    Senior Member zY|'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,387
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke
    cliff notes if you actually read this one
    Whiny bitch journalist stirring up controversy.
    Triple-six killers in this motherfucker runnin shit

  4. #4
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke
    cliff notes if you actually read this one
    C'mon, that's not even a long article.
    I heart cock

  5. #5
    Senior Member Ludo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,932
    Rep Power
    35

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Toldja it was boring
    2013: +8.24u(increased unit size on 5/19)
    Favorites: 20-6 + 6.13u
    Underdogs: 10-19 -2.51u
    Ludo's Locks Parlay Project: +1.4u

    2012: +20.311u

  6. #6
    10 year vet Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    30,071
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by zY|

    Whiny bitch journalist stirring up controversy.

    Yep ,read it and you are exactly right .You'd think Ludo wrote it
    2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP



  7. #7
    Senior Member Ludo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,932
    Rep Power
    35

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Maybe I'm just ignorant, being someone who hasn't watched many boxing fights or really followed the sport. But I thought the fight last night was boring as hell after the fourth round. Thats just me, I saw a guy landing shots at will while always being a step ahead of the other guy and didn't even try to finish him it seemed like. If the guy is such a superior athlete and superior boxer than the guy he's fighting why the fuck didn't he finish him?
    2013: +8.24u(increased unit size on 5/19)
    Favorites: 20-6 + 6.13u
    Underdogs: 10-19 -2.51u
    Ludo's Locks Parlay Project: +1.4u

    2012: +20.311u

  8. #8
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by LudoCain
    If the guy is such a superior athlete and superior boxer than the guy he's fighting why the fuck didn't he finish him?
    Ask GSP.

    Besides, Sugar Shane is no fucking joke. I've seen him at #3 in P4P lists right after Pacquiao and Mayweather. I'm not a big boxing fan myself, but it doesn't surprise me that Mayweather didn't finish last night.
    I heart cock

  9. #9
    10 year vet Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    30,071
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by LudoCain
    If the guy is such a superior athlete and superior boxer than the guy he's fighting why the fuck didn't he finish him?

    One reason is because he's fighting two weight classes above his normal weight and Mosley was the naturally bigger man.Another reason is Mayweather is a defensive fighter and doesnt try to finish people ,for the most part he just tries to out point them.The last reason is gloves are so much bigger in boxing.

    In MMA terms it would be like BJ Penn moving up to fight GSP and trying to knock out the bigger GSP with two pillows on his hands for gloves.


    Like I said I didnt think it was going to be a "fight of the year" type fight to watch but it wasnt bad.

    Watch Vazquez-Marquez May 22nd I think you'll like that one for sure
    2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP



  10. #10
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke
    Like I said I didnt think it was going to be a "fight of the year" type fight to watch but it wasnt bad.
    I agree.

    Better than the JMM fight.
    I heart cock

  11. #11
    215 Hustler Mr. IWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    99,956
    Rep Power
    137

    Re: Article: "If Mayweather isn't fighting Pacquiao, look away"

    I didnt think it was that bad a fight. From a betting perspective, I almost shit on my self in the 2nd round when Mayweather got rocked a couple times. The rest of the fight, even though Floyd was in control, I kept thinking that Shane had it in him late for one last flurry, and could put Floyd in trouble again. That boxing clinic Floyd put on was a bettors best friend.

    Maybe if I didnt have money on it, I would have had a different take, but thats my thoughts on it.
    Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •