Brooks's Campaign

[SPX]

haha SPX you set me up for failure (jk). You are right about this place being more laid back. I made a thread at mmajunkie but apparently I am not aloud to track my picks so the thread got locked. Might just be me but i find that ridiculous.

Interesting. That must be a rule they recently instituted. I actually don't go over there anymore. I don't think the quality of posters over there is any higher than it is here, and there's not the same sense of community over there.

[SPX]

Yeah. I see what GCAD is trying to do, but Ithink he's going about it the wrong way. w/e

Ol' GCAD. He rose from humble poster to moderator. I should challenge him to a Moderator vs Moderator battle of picks.

[Ludo]

Yeah. I see what GCAD is trying to do, but Ithink he's going about it the wrong way. w/e

Ol' GCAD. He rose from humble poster to moderator. I should challenge him to a Moderator vs Moderator battle of picks.

I think apples to apples we could probably give that whole board a run for it's money. Between Scientist's hard on for Jiu Jitsu and borderline obsessive compulsive behavior toward research, Svino's "I just raped your mom with math" rainman effect, Luke's extensive boxing knowledge, PP's balls to the wall style of chasing, SPX's susceptibility to "your mom" lines, sideloaded's crazy predictions, and My eye for underdogs and an innate ability to be an asshole we'd have a good shot.

Plus, most of us have seen "the hair".

[Luke]

I think apples to apples we could probably give that whole board a run for it's money. Between Scientist's hard on for Jiu Jitsu and borderline obsessive compulsive behavior toward research, Svino's "I just raped your mom with math" rainman effect, Luke's extensive boxing knowledge, PP's balls to the wall style of chasing, SPX's susceptibility to "your mom" lines, sideloaded's crazy predictions, and My eye for underdogs and an innate ability to be an asshole we'd have a good shot.

Plus, most of us have seen "the hair" .

That was awesom Ludo

[brooks85]

because I have seen him stuff takedowns and as I said, lentz is not a powerful wrestler so all he. His shot is very weak and telegraphed.



adding

mendes/vazquez 2.2 units to win 2

5d released this morning, adding to the parlay

mendes/vazques 2.1 to win 2

[Luke]

. I made a thread at mmajunkie but apparently I am not aloud to track my picks so the thread got locked. Might just be me but i find that ridiculous.

Thats just plain stupid .I cant even think of a reason they'd do that

[brooks85]

fuk em


adding


mendes/jorgensen 5u to win 4

[MMA_scientist]

I think apples to apples we could probably give that whole board a run for it's money. Between Scientist's hard on for Jiu Jitsu and borderline obsessive compulsive behavior toward research, Svino's "I just raped your mom with math" rainman effect, Luke's extensive boxing knowledge, PP's balls to the wall style of chasing, SPX's susceptibility to "your mom" lines, sideloaded's crazy predictions, and My eye for underdogs and an innate ability to be an asshole we'd have a good shot.

Plus, most of us have seen "the hair".

Yeah, I actually hate most of you guys, but I keep coming back because it is the best place to get a counter-perspective or second opinion on a fight. I would put our board against any other on the net as far as fanship/knowledge goes. Zewkey has some grizzled guys, but they lack the MMA knowledge we have here, IMO. I mean, you guys make some crazy bets and I wouldn't let you guys manage my bankroll... but we get some pretty good breakdowns going if we can stay on track for more than 3 or 4 posts consecutively.

SD and Junkie are just stupid, I don't even bother there. I usually check here, there are 3 or 4 really good guys on my blog, and then I bet. Or more often, I just bet and then regret it.

[poopoo333]

Yeah, I actually hate most of you guys

[Mr. IWS]

Yeah, I actually hate most of you guys, but I keep coming back because it is the best place to get a counter-perspective or second opinion on a fight. I would put our board against any other on the net as far as fanship/knowledge goes. Zewkey has some grizzled guys, but they lack the MMA knowledge we have here, IMO. I mean, you guys make some crazy bets and I wouldn't let you guys manage my bankroll... but we get some pretty good breakdowns going if we can stay on track for more than 3 or 4 posts consecutively.

SD and Junkie are just stupid, I don't even bother there. I usually check here, there are 3 or 4 really good guys on my blog, and then I bet. Or more often, I just bet and then regret it.

Well, I still love you no matter what.

[Mr. IWS]

fuk em


adding


mendes/jorgensen 5u to win 4

GL on it my man.

[sideloaded]

Yeah. I see what GCAD is trying to do, but Ithink he's going about it the wrong way. w/e

Ol' GCAD. He rose from humble poster to moderator. I should challenge him to a Moderator vs Moderator battle of picks.

I think apples to apples we could probably give that whole board a run for it's money. Between Scientist's hard on for Jiu Jitsu and borderline obsessive compulsive behavior toward research, Svino's "I just raped your mom with math" rainman effect, Luke's extensive boxing knowledge, PP's balls to the wall style of chasing, SPX's susceptibility to "your mom" lines, sideloaded's crazy predictions, and My eye for underdogs and an innate ability to be an asshole we'd have a good shot.

Plus, most of us have seen "the hair".

Thanks for the props dog.

[MMA_scientist]

Yeah, I actually hate most of you guys

Well, I still love you no matter what.

Not you.



I think we all know I was talking about SPX.

[SPX]

I think we all know I was talking about SPX.

I'm not sure how to respond to this.

[Mr. IWS]

I'm not sure how to respond to this.

[insert generic mom comment]

[SPX]

[insert generic mom comment]

[insert generic foot in someone's ass]

[Mr. IWS]

We are destroying brooks's thread, lol

Brooks, let me know if you want me to move all this shit outta here.

[brooks85]

haha its cool




shitty 5d opening limits

mir -210 risking 2.1u to win 1

hornbuckle/randy inside the distance/mir 1u to win 1.33

[MMA_scientist]

We are destroying brooks's thread, lol

Brooks, let me know if you want me to move all this shit outta here.

Like I said, if we could stay on topic for more than 3 or 4 posts...

[brooks85]

time for my jackpot parlays. Believe it or not, ive had some good success with these.


paixao/vazquez/mendes/jorgensen/lamas/poirer/hornbuckle .5u to win 10
mickelwright/proirer/barret/cavalcanter/winner .05u to win 13.87
paixao/lamas/mickelwright/porier/winner/edgar .1u to win 12.13
poirer/micklewright/cavalcante/barret/bisping decision/guillard decision/diaz decision .01u to win 11.13
poirer/mickelwright/penn decision/diaz decision/wiman decision/guillard decision/bisping decision/hardy decision/kampmann decison/gsp decision .01u to win 14.54
poirer/mickelwright/penn decision/guillard decision/bisping decision/hardy decision/kampmann decison/gsp decision .025u to win 7.33
poirer/mickelwright/cavalcante/penn decision/guillard decision/bisping decision/hardy decision/kampmann decison/gsp decision .025u to win 30.52




all the decision fights are "goes to decision," meaning penn-edgar goes to decison, bisping-akiyama goes to decision. I just listed the fighter who I think who is going win the decision to save space.