Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Bleacher Report Internal Memo: How to Stay on Dana's Good Side

  1. #1
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60

    Bleacher Report Internal Memo: How to Stay on Dana's Good Side

    This is a couple of years old but I just saw it for the first time. It's from a Bleacher Report internal memo about how not to piss off Dana and Co. and the best practices for their writers to maintain their media credentials.

    Pretty interesting stuff. Thoughts?


    Brian asked me to put together a small list of "things you don't do" regarding writing about Zuffa. I've had a ton of experience with Dana, both professional and personal, and I have a pretty good handle on what makes him tick and what pisses him off. (everything in this email is full internal purposes and not to be shared).


    Here you go:

    - Don't delve too deep into Zuffa financials. This goes for fighter pay, revenue, money donated to political campaigns. This is Dana's biggest pet peeve. Because they are a private company, it's almost impossible to verify actual financial numbers for any of these subjects. Even if you have two good sources verifying your information, there are still a lot of things they do behind the scenes that makes it a really tough subject to get right.

    There are all kinds of under-the-table bonuses paid to fighters, from the top of the card all the way to the bottom. I have personally, with my own two eyes, seen a fighter who made $8,000 to show and $8,000 to win be handed a check for $45,000 after his fight ended because they were so happy with the excitement of his bout. This is not a random occurence - it happens multiple times per event, every event.

    Nothing pisses Dana off more than people talking about Zuffa's financials and getting everything wrong. There is literally no way to grasp everything they do with their money, so there's no point in trying to speculate.

    This is a very good way to piss them off and find yourself blacklisted. Stay away from it.

    - Don't "report" things unless you have two very credible sources. Don't take a rumor and post it as fact.

    - Don't report something a manager tells you unless you have verified it with someone who is not a manager. Managers will often use you to get their message out.

    Loretta Hunt was banned from the UFC because she reported a story that was fed to her by Ken Pavia, who was actually feeding her false information because he was upset with Zuffa over the amount of backstage passes he was receiving for shows. Managers have tried to feed me information in the past that turned out to be false.

    Don't be a mouthpiece and don't let them use you to send a message, because you'll be the one who gets burned.

    - Don't be a mouthpiece for a fighter, either. They'll use you in the same way managers do when trying to send a message to the UFC.

    - Don't talk about Dana's history with his mom. This is a fantastic way to find yourself blacklisted. Do not do it, either in articles or on Twitter or Facebook. It doesn't matter anymore, anyway, so there's no point.

    - If you're writing an opinion article with a negative slant on Zuffa, make sure it's clearly worded as opinion. Don't mix rumors with your opinions. Dana has told me personally that he doesn't care if you write negative opinion stuff, so long as people know it's opinion. Don't mix negative opinion with reporting.

    - Don't be negative just to be negative or edgy. Dana doesn't mind being asked tough questions, but consider the circumstance when you're doing it. If you're at a press conference or a conference call for a UFC event, keep your questions related to that event.

    Don't bust out a question about a controversial topic in the middle of a press event designed to promote a certain fight card. Wait until after the press conference ends. Dana usually does a media scrum, and that's the best place to ask those types of questions. Save your questions for the right moment and you'll find that Dana is very accommodating.

    - And finally, always remember this: you would be SHOCKED to learn how much they pay attention to when it comes to MMA media. Their corporate and PR teams love Bleacher Report, and they read everything. You may think you're flying under the radar, but you aren't. They are all paying attention.

    Each and every day, the UFC PR team prepares a "morning report" consisting of articles from all major newspapers and MMA websites. This report is compiled and emailed to everyone on the corporate side of things, from top communications execs all the way to Dana and Lorenzo. I've seen these reports, and they are very thorough. And yes, they include Bleacher Report stories.

    You're always being watched. I don't say this to scare you. I say it to let you know that you're not an unknown commodity, and that people are paying attention. They read what you write. Mistakes you make now, when you think you're under the radar, could end up burning you down the line.
    I heart cock

  2. #2
    215 Hustler Mr. IWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    99,748
    Rep Power
    137
    Good info man, never new about this.

    I think thats pretty sound advice for covering any sport let alone the UFC.
    Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter




  3. #3
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60
    Yeah, it's pretty interesting. It's not quite as nefarious as one might expect.

    But one person in the article comments did make a good point and that was that it's a little strange to always be walking this tightrope for your media credentials. With other sports organizations, provided you don't break some very clear and reasonable rules, then you get to keep your credentials regardless of how much of an asshole you are or how many hard questions you ask.
    I heart cock

  4. #4
    10 year vet Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    30,071
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by SPX View Post
    Yeah, it's pretty interesting. It's not quite as nefarious as one might expect.

    But one person in the article comments did make a good point and that was that it's a little strange to always be walking this tightrope for your media credentials. With other sports organizations, provided you don't break some very clear and reasonable rules, then you get to keep your credentials regardless of how much of an asshole you are or how many hard questions you ask.
    No shit. This is pussy type stuff...."don't make Dana mad" Why kind of journalism is that? No other sport does this stuff . Just last weekend boxing annoucers were going off about a boxer (who was fighting at the time) becuase he got popped for roids. You'd never see that in the UFC. They hide shit like no one knows it happened.

    I just think its increidbily weird they step softly around the UFC. What they are too stupid to realize is no one wants to read Rousey-Mayweather and Diaz suspension stores every day...they want you to ask "why was the Belfort drug test hid" and write a piece about that, or something interesting. MMA journalists are the lowest of the low. They ask nothing, are afraid to speak up, and dont write nothing worth reading. I bet "real" journalist make fun of them, seriously.

    Its like they are Dana's groupies instead of journalist.
    2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP



  5. #5
    Senior Member SPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23,876
    Rep Power
    60
    The MMA magazine I used to write for (Ultimate MMA) actually lost their press credentials. They used to fly a couple of guys out to cover all the events and then BOOM -- credentials revoked. The fucked up thing, at least as far as I was told, was that my editor never even knew why. He had suspicions--he had heard something about Zuffa not liking one of the articles that ran--but nothing was ever confirmed and Zuffa never communicated the reason to them directly.
    I heart cock

  6. #6
    Senior Member edman5555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,630
    Rep Power
    34
    Not as bad as I thought.
    1 unit = 300 $

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •