MAX'S 3 GAME SPECIAL

[Max 2]

1. TAKE THE BILLS - 2.5 AGAINST THE CHIEFS
BILLS WILL COME THROUGH AGAINST A WEAK KC TEAM

2. TAKE ARIZONA + 3.5 AGAINST THE G MEN
IT IS IMPORTANT TO BUY HALF A POINT IN CASE THE GIANTS WIN BY A FIELD GOAL
THERE IS REVERSE LINE MOVEMENT ON THIS GAME

3. TAKE DALLAS - 9.5 AGAINST SAN FRAN
ROMO AND THE BOYS ARE BACK

AS ALWAYS GL BOYS

[Chico1856]

Good Luck today Max, I think the Cards win outright today

[tryhard1]

best of luck max

[Betting Bitch]

The Arizona line opened at 3.5. According to BetED.com the money is on Arizona. That is why the line moved to 3. Where is the reverse line movement? Unless you are saying that because there are more bets on the G-Men, but that doesn't mean a thing.

[Max 2]

ACCORDING TO MY INFO MORE MONEY WAS ON THE GMEN BUT LINE MOVED FROM - 3.5 TO 3

[Betting Bitch]

Well this is my source

http://www.covers.com/articles/articles ... Art=165886 (http://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=165886)

[Luke]

Well this is my source

http://www.covers.com/articles/articles ... Art=165886 (http://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=165886)


::lmao:: covers.com is your source?? Sorry no offense but anyone that believes anything from that site should reconsider gambling. How can you believe anything from a site that advertisers for every sportsbook in the industry on every page of their site? Gee with the money they get from sportsbooks I wonder who they side with?I remember years ago me and my buddies would just look at the cover story on covers and who they were predicting to win that night and just bet the opposite.The only thing covers.com does is try to get you on the wrong side of a game. So any article from them is BS

I quit going to that site for info when I realized they were on the books side

[Betting Bitch]

Meh, if they are on the book's side they should know where the money is. I don't go for thier for picks, the only thing I use that site for mainly is for their overall matchup charts. My record speaks for itself, so I won't be reconsidering gambling at this time thanks.

Weather the source is good or bad, I least I post the source. Better than confidential source.

Every news paper, site, etc in the world has an agenda. Some are liberal, some are conservative. In this case some are in the pockets of certain books. Doesn't mean you can't find information. You just can't believe everything you read.

[RedHottG2]

Well this is my source

http://www.covers.com/articles/articles ... Art=165886 (http://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=165886)
If you really want to know where the smart money is and have accurate 'steam' moves to help with your picks consider a premium subscription with sports insights. I have been using them for about two years now and are one of the most valuable resources involved with my handicapping criteria among other things.

[Luke]

Meh, if they are on the book's side they should know where the money is. I don't go for thier for picks, the only thing I use that site for mainly is for their overall matchup charts. My record speaks for itself, so I won't be reconsidering gambling at this time thanks.

Weather the source is good or bad, I least I post the source. Better than confidential source.

Every news paper, site, etc in the world has an agenda. Some are liberal, some are conservative. In this case some are in the pockets of certain books. Doesn't mean you can't find information. You just can't believe everything you read.

I didn't say that they weren't good for matchups I said any ARTICLES they write are BS. I don't care if someone posts a source or not because the only source I use is myself. I would just be careful using anything wrote by anyone from covers when betting.

The truth is I don't think it matters where the money is or what % of people are on one side or the other,at least I don't use it.Some people do but I don't


One more thing ::hijack::


::lmao:: sorry max

[Max 2]

NO PROBLEM LUKE

I APPRECIATE YOUR INSIGHT

[Luke]

Great job today max


::clap:: ::clap:: ::clap::

[spuddy999]

Nice thread!

Nice day Max!

[spuddy999]

::hijack:: Luke - Thanks for posting the insight re. covers.com - I always liked the site: injuries, analysis, matchups, etc... never thought about bias on picks but always wondered why I didn't like 'em half the time (they do post SOME winning picks)...
Today, they were touting Detroit & Arizona plus the points and over on HOU/CLE....

No way were they going to talk me into either DET or ARI today, but I was already looking for a reason to latch onto the lack-of-Hou-D vs Brady Quinn + expected-turnovers-a-plenty = OVER hype...
I guess they nudged me closer toward that HOU over today...

Yeah, I did notice all the ads for the all of those sportsbooks, but often I'm retarded at 'doing the math' - that's why I'm here!

This just in: also ignore the AP's tilt on EVERY GAME in EVERY SPORT - it's all just more hype...

Again, thanks for insight!

[Betting Bitch]

Though I didn't agree with your explanation of Arizone, it is undeniable that you had a good day.

Good Job, Good luck tonight