I guess I should watch that one. Carlo Prater is pretty experienced. A lot of losses though. Cheisa seems like a really big lightweight. Are you sure he won't gas in this? How are his submissions? He could end up on his back. I did read that Cheisa has a background in wrestling. High school though. It can't hurt.
UFC on FOX 5
Collapse
X
-
Scott Jorgensen looks like a decent bet over John Albert. Albert is pretty much a rookie and shouldn't have the takedown defense to stop Jorgensen. I would think Jorgensen would be the better at subs due to experience and a background in grappling. The striking could be a wash or a plus to Albert. Anyone think Albert is a better striker or likely to win?1 unit = 300 $Comment
-
Albert is a pretty good fighter.. for 1 round (or half a round). After that, if he cant finish his opponent, he is done. Jorgensen is pretty tough to finish but he is also an aggressive fighter. I think Jorgensen gonna win but he's probably gonna be around -250.
PP, i just watched the Lemarcuss fight with Prador. He didnt look that bad. His wrestling looked good to me, esp when he looked alot smaller than Prador. (chiesa gonna be even taller than Prador but much skinnier). His sub defense might be average but he did fine against Prador. If he can keep this fight with chiesa on the feet, which i think he will if he wanted to, i think he'll win a striking battle with chiesa. Chiesa is tall and long reach but his striking is pretty bad. Regarding Lemarcuss' stamina, he didnt look so gassed out after the fight to me. It was a high pace fight with alot of grappling. I doubt Cheisa will be anywhere around +200 tho.Comment
-
Based on his fights on TUF. His striking is worse than bad. But he has been training a lot lately. It could have gotten better. We have seen that a lot lately with TUFers getting way better in some aeras after the showComment
-
Comment

Comment