WEC 48

[Luke]

Re: WEC 48

http://www.investwithsports.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=6959&hilit=arlovski&start=15

I am very wise

Clearly I already knew that, hence the

"Which is why it would be interesting to see how the other books open if people could lay off destroying the bookmaker openers."

which is the same point I was about to make again.

Just say it .I thought you everything

I am very wise

[Luke]

Re: WEC 48

Does anyone know where I can rewatch the Henderson-Cerrone fight? I cant seem to find it anywhere

[Ludo]

Re: WEC 48

http://www.mma-core.com/videos/_Donald_ ... 97&tid=100


Who's your daddy?

[zY|]

Re: WEC 48

Does anyone know where I can rewatch the Henderson-Cerrone fight? I cant seem to find it anywhere

I've got it in HD on my hard drive. No big deal.

[Luke]

Re: WEC 48

Just say it .I thought you everything

I am very wise

taught not thought I must be tired

[Luke]

Re: WEC 48

http://www.mma-core.com/videos/_Donald_Cerrone_vs_Benson_Henderson_WEC_43?vid=100 07097&tid=100


Who's your daddy?

Thanks

I looked there but only found one dead link.Guess I didnt look hard enough

[poopoo333]

Re: WEC 48

2.5u on Jorgenson @-240
0.5u on Njokuani @+120
2u on Faber @+260

This is going to be a hit or miss night.

[MMA_scientist]

Re: WEC 48

^^ Swinging fo the fences on Faber. I will probably drop .5 on Faber...
I am still searching for a bet though. I have ruled out Visher and Garcia (which I originally thought were bettable).

How is Mizugaki's takedown defense?

[poopoo333]

Re: WEC 48

^^ Swinging fo the fences on Faber. I will probably drop .5 on Faber...
I am still searching for a bet though. I have ruled out Visher and Garcia (which I originally thought were bettable).

How is Mizugaki's takedown defense?

If I recall correctly, Jorgensen basically won via wrestling. I bet on Jorgensen as a dog in that fight.

Here are Mizugaki's WEC fight play by plays:

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-45 ... Play-21637

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-42 ... Play-19010

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/WEC-40 ... Play-16863

[MMA_scientist]

Re: WEC 48

^^ I guess I am going to have to rule out that fight as well.

I got nothing on this card. I am probably going to abstain, with the exception of a tiny value bet on Faber.

[Ludo]

Re: WEC 48

Yeah I think I'll just stick with what I have so far, maybe a bet on Jorgensen if anything else.

[Luke]

Re: WEC 48

I think Henderson takes Cerrone again.In the first fight I dont think Cerrone won like some people .I clearly give him rounds 2&3 and also gave him round one which was closer.IMO the reason Cerrone won rounds 4 & 5 was not because he started figuring Henderson out it was because Henderson was tired.He spent a ton of energy in rounds
1-3 and didnt have enough gas in 4 and 5 for takedowns

Cerrone will never beat a wrestler imo because he has zero foot work.He walks flat footed and walks people down ,thats a big no no when fighting a wrestler because someone with no foot work makes it easy for a wrestler to successfully get takedowns because theres less guess work.All they have to do is shoot.

Cerrone couldnt submit Varner,couldnt submit Henderson and has no takedown defense.I'll be betting Henderson Saturday

[poopoo333]

Re: WEC 48

Good luck Luke.

There are three +400 or better dogs on this card. Based on past WEC events, some big underdogs will probably win on Saturday. Putting a half unit on each will net a profit as long as one wins. hmmm. also, I am pretty sure Pettis took this fight on short notice.

[zY|]

Re: WEC 48

I think Henderson takes Cerrone again.In the first fight I dont think Cerrone won like some people .I clearly give him rounds 2&3 and also gave him round one which was closer.IMO the reason Cerrone won rounds 4 & 5 was not because he started figuring Henderson out it was because Henderson was tired.He spent a ton of energy in rounds
1-3 and didnt have enough gas in 4 and 5 for takedowns

Cerrone will never beat a wrestler imo because he has zero foot work.He walks flat footed and walks people down ,thats a big no no when fighting a wrestler because someone with no foot work makes it easy for a wrestler to successfully get takedowns because theres less guess work.All they have to do is shoot.

Cerrone couldnt submit Varner,couldnt submit Henderson and has no takedown defense.I'll be betting Henderson Saturday

I could understand a Henderson bet, but Cerrone clearly won the first fight.

Even if you scored round 1 for Henderson (which btw not only makes you wrong but a bad person), the 5th round has to be a 10-8 by anyone's standards. It was total rape and domination. Draw at best for Henderson.

[SPX]

Re: WEC 48

(which btw not only makes you wrong but a bad person)

Ha ha ha. . . That's funny.

Me, personally, I thought it was one of those fights that just could've gone either way. It was another Shogun/Machida or Penn/Edgar. A lot of people are going to say that one guy or the other "definitely" won, but really a lot of it comes down to how you score it and what you think is important. People score fights different ways because they give weight to different criteria.