UFC on Versus 5

[edman5555]

http://mma-core.pl/?p=2680

faber wineland

Well i just finished watching this and I have to say Wineland should have some trouble with Benavidez's speed. Wineland displayed some pretty solid wrestling in round 1 though. Bena just fought Ian Loveland in what I am reading was a somewhat close fight. I don't know. I think Videz will win but I can see how Wineland is a live dog.

[edman5555]

http://mma-core.pl/?p=2680

faber wineland

[poopoo333]

fucking double post

[MMA_scientist]

I think he will win. Everyone thinks he will win, but he is not the kind of favorite I liek to bet on. Just seems like a gamble given the footage we have of him whiffing on haymakers for 15 minutes. Dana went crazy because his favorite fights are sloppy brawls. But I wasn't impressed with his "Muy Thai". That said, Reinhardt has shown even less and he is old as hell and cutting to BW for the 1st time. But he is a grappler and Figeroa got taken down a bunch.

What I am trying to say, basically, is good luck.

[edman5555]

ah ok. I see your point. He should win.

[poopoo333]

In my last fight, I didn't perform at all like I normally fight. I had an eight month layoff then took the fight with six days’ notice having a pulled groin, 26lbs cut, and against a heavily favored opponent. I came up short on the decision, won "Fight of The Night", sacrificed my first loss, but got to prove I belong in the UFC. Now I get a full camp and remind myself how a Saekson trained fighter really fights.

-Figueora

[poopoo333]

In my last fight, I didn't perform at all like I normally fight. I had an eight month layoff then took the fight with six days’ notice having a pulled groin, 26lbs cut, and against a heavily favored opponent. I came up short on the decision, won "Fight of The Night", sacrificed my first loss, but got to prove I belong in the UFC. Now I get a full camp and remind myself how a Saekson trained fighter really fights.

-Figueora

[MMA_scientist]

I told you to grab it because it was going to move. Those props move a lot, the value is readily apparent when they open IMO.

[poopoo333]

Not Hardy by sub is up to -3295...thanks Scientist

[MMA_scientist]

yep, that is the idea. Unit for unit, my return is a lot better. Of course, it can all come crashing down in one night, so the risk it about 10x higher. I know I talked to you guys about this. Basically, I want to do a 3u parlay bankroll. Take my $1500, and just divide it in into 3 $500 units. I will parlay 1 $500 unit until I can turn it over 3x (to 1500). And then start over. If I get wiped out, I start with the 2nd $500. If not, I take the new $1500, add it to the original, now I have 3 $1000 units.

I like mechanical money management systems because I am an emotional bettor.

[poopoo333]

Also, I wish Bookmaker offered the "Not by ..." options. I need more bet points.

[poopoo333]

Man that is a really good idea, as long as you don't force anything and just be patient. Think about it...upcoming there are the opportunities (going in order for UFC events) such as Not Schaub by sub, Not Ellenberger by sub, Not Gomi by sub (or Not Hunt by Sub), Not Barry by sub, Not Guillard or Santiago by sub, and Not Condit or Cro Cop by sub. I don't see anything @ UFC 138 and UFC 139 only has a few fights. For Strikeforce there is Not Sergei, Rockhold, or King Mo by sub in September.

All locks.

[edman5555]

I think not Hardy inside the distance is pretty good, unless he cuts lytle...

[MMA_scientist]

yeah, just the props. Like I said, some events I can't come up with a magic parlay, but there might be something I would like ot bet. So i just roll it into my 2011 parlay. Like with Not Daley by submission vs Diaz. I think it was the only prop I wanted to bet on that card, but I still wanted it as part of my parlay.

[poopoo333]

Oh ok, so you are doing it with the props this time. I remember before shark fights last year you will doing your locks parlay with actual fights. It's a pretty good idea imo. I might start that for this event.