5-11-09

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. IWS
    215 Hustler
    • Sep 2006
    • 99936

    #1

    5-11-09

    Larry Ness Monday

    Larry's 2nd Round 10* NBA Total

    The Hawks "hung around" the Cavs until the third quarter of Game 3 but LeBron's 47 points, 12 rebounds and eight assists eventually led to another impressive Cleveland victory. The Cavs would win Game 3 by the score of 89-72 and are now are on the verge of a second consecutive four-game sweep. Cleveland is 7-0 SU and ATS in the 2009 postseason with ALL seven wins coming by at least double digits and the average margin of victory being 18.0 PPG, including by 21.3 PPG in this series. The scary thing for the rest of the NBA is that it's been more than LeBron (33.7-10.0-6.6) this postseason. Yes, he has played 108 minutes in this series and scored 108 points but Williams (15.1-4.4 APG), West (12.1-3.9-4.1) and Ilgauskas (10.3-6.1) plus a host of other role players have all played well this postseason. It all starts with LeBron but this year, "The King" definitely has a 'court!' Is this the end of the road for the Hawks? It may be but there is sure no more pressure on them, down 0-3. After shooting an abysmal 38.8 percent in the first two games in Cleveland, the Hawks were much better in Game 3, shooting 44.7 percent, including a solid 7-of-18 (38.9 percent) on threes. The Hawks averaged 98.1 PPG on 45.8 percent from the floor this season and I'm expecting a good game from them . As for the Cavs, this team has averaged 96.4 PPG through seven postseason games and that includes that 'ugly' Game 3 in Detroit, when the Cavs outlasted the Pistons, just 79-68. In the three games vs the Hawks, the Cavs have averaged 100.3 PPG, while shooting 50.2 percent. What should change tonight? The Cavs have to 'LOVE' that the Lakers are struggling (tied 2-all with the Rockets after an embarrassing Game 4 loss on Sunday) and will sure want to "finish the Hawks' here, especially with the Celtics and Magic likely headed for a seven-game series (winner will be Cleveland's next opponent). Expect the Cavs to at least reach their "average" in this series (100 points) and for the Hawks to finally "settle down" (with ZERO pressure) and play their best game. That scenario would mean a game which will end a full two TDs over this total.


    2nd Round 10* Total Cle/Atl Over.


    Larry's 9* Team Mismatch

    The Nats open a three-game series with the Giants tonight in San Francisco. First let me deal with the starting pitchers. Daniel Cabrera goes for the Nats and Randy Johnson for the Giants. While Johnson is destined for Cooperstown, Cabrera is still looking for his first win of 2009 (this is his seventh start). Why should that be a surprise? Cabrera went 12-8 as rookie with the Orioles back in 2004 and was lauded as an "up and comer." I never quite got that, as his ERA that season was 5.00 ERA. So what has happened since then? His ERA over the next four seasons (all with Baltimore) was 5.06 and his record reflected it, as Cabrera went 36-51 (.414) in 119 starts, with the Orioles doing just slightly better in all of his starts, posting a 52-67 (.437) mark. Baltimore had seen enough but for some reason, their Washington, D.C. neighbors took a chance on Cabrera. His first NL season has not gone well, with Cabrera opening 0-3 with a 4.85 ERA in six starts, all of which are Nationals losses. I surely don't have to recap the Big Unit's accomplishments but it is fair to say, he's no longer a dominant pitcher. In his second start of 2009 he lasted just 3.2 innings at Dodger Stadium, allowing eight hits and seven ERs in an 11-1 loss. In his last outing at Coors Field, he made it through 5.2 innings, again allowing eight hits and seven ERs, as the Giants lost by another 11-1 score. However, in between those two miserable outings, Johnson went 17.1 innings over three starts, allowing just eight hits and two ERs (1.04 ERA), going 2-0 (team was 3-0!). Now to the teams. The Nats own MLB's worst record at 10-19 and while the team can hit (.274 average / 5.00 RPG), the pitching staff (starters and relievers) is awful, ranking 27th in MLB with a 5.41 ERA. Meanwhile, the Giants are a surprising 16-14 (impressive for a club which has averaged only 73.5 wins per season the last four years), including 10-4 at home. The Giants can't hit much (.248 team BA), which has led them to an average of just 3.63 RPG. However, the staff ERA is 3.87, which ranks third in all of MLB. In the team's 14 home games, the Giants are allowing only 2.57 RPG (no wonder they are 10-4). The Nationals come in 5-12 away from home, allowing a whopping 6.65 RPG! The Giants come in playing with loads of confidence, as they will go for their 14th win in their last 20 games. Despite finishing just 72-90 in 2008, the Giants won all SEVEN meetings with the Nationals last year, outscoring them 38-13 while batting .288 as a team with their pitching staff posting a 1.71 ERA (their lowest against any team last season).

    Team Mismatch on the SF Giants
    Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



  • Mr. IWS
    215 Hustler
    • Sep 2006
    • 99936

    #2
    Re: 5-11-09

    Burns NBA

    Basketball (NBA)

    UNDER nuggets/mavs

    Game: Denver Nuggets vs. Dallas Mavericks Game Time: 5/11/2009 9:30:00 PM Prediction: under Reason: I'm playing on Denver and Dallas to finish UNDER the total. Game 3 finished above the total. However, it only did so by the slightest of margins and the game wasn't "over" until Carmelo Anthony's last second 3-pointer. Note that game had a halftime score of just 48-45, so easily could have finished with fewer points. This evening's over/under number opened slightly higher and has since been bet up. I expect a lower scoring affair and believe the higher number offers us excellent value. Some may feel that because the series is now 3-0 that the Mavericks are just going to pack it in on the defensive side of the ball, knowing that they aren't going to be able to come back and win the series anyway. I don't expect the Mavs, who have never been swept in a 4-game series, to just roll over. The Mavs, who were victim's of a non-foul call prior to Anthony's clutch shot, have seen the UNDER go 16-8 the last 24 times that they were attempting to avenge an earlier home loss. That includes a profitable 9-3 (75%) 'under' mark their last 12 in that situation. Even including the Game 3 result, they've still seen the UNDER go 18-8 the last 26 times that they hosted the Nuggets. Speaking of "18-8," even with the Game 3 result, the Nuggets have still seen the UNDER go 18-8 the last 26 times that they were listed as underdogs. They've also seen 18 of their last 25 (72%) games against "winning teams" stay below the total. The last time that the Nuggets were underdogs of roughly this size was in Game 4 of their opening series, when they were getting +1.5 points at New Orleans. That game stayed below the number as the Nuggets limited the Hornets to a mere 63 points. I expect them to deliver another strong defensive effort and I look for the final combined score to stay below the generous number. *Western Conf. Playoff TOM
    ATLANTA

    Game: Cleveland Cavaliers vs. Atlanta Hawks Game Time: 5/11/2009 7:00:00 PM Prediction: Atlanta Hawks Reason: I'm taking the points with ATLANTA. While I've been on an extremely solid overall run for quite some time, it's been no thanks to Cleveland. It's true. I've gone against the Cavaliers a few times in these playoffs and each time, I've come up short. (Last game I lost with Atlanta but won with the 'under.') It hasn't been a matter of missing the "right spots" to go against the Cavs, it's been that there have been no right spots to go against them. Indeed, in addition to having won every game, they're perfect against the spread. Some will call me "stubborn" for going against the Cavs tonight. That's ok, as I don't see it that way. While I always try and learn from my "mistakes," I also don't let my past results (wins or losses) with a particular team affect my judgement, when doing my handicapping. For me, each game represents a fresh slate and I always attempt to look at them without bias. That said, I feel that the Hawks provide excellent value this evening. Everyone knows how great the Cavs have been. Everyone also knows that this series is over. Up 3-0, it would be tough enough for the Hawks to come back and win the series, even if Lebron suddenly couldn't play. With James in the lineup, winning four straight would be nothing short of a miracle. Many are also aware that teams up 3-0 have fared quite well in the NBA playoffs in recent years. As a result, most will feel that the Hawks will "just pack it in" here. Very few will be willing to back them while everyone and their dog will be laying the wood with the Cavs. All those factors have caused tonight's line to be extremely high. Not surprisingly, this is the most points that Atlanta has been getting at home all season. Note that the Hawks are 7-4 ATS (64%) since 1996 when listed as home underdogs in the +9.5 to +12 range. Its true that teams down 0-3 haven't fared too well since the league switched to the best of 7 format in 2003. However, in 18 cases where a team was in position for a 4-0 sweep, the average line was less than 4.5 points. Obviously, tonight's much higher line gives us a lot more room to work with. To put the line in some perspective, lets look at the other series. Denver has been nearly as impressive as Cleveland in the playoffs, as the Nuggets are also perfect against the spread. Like the Cavs, the Nuggets are also in position to complete the sweep. Yet, in that series the team (Dallas) which is down 0-3 is actually favored for Game 4. Note that the Hawks regular season home record (31-10) was nearly identical to Dallas' 32-9 home mark. I'm not saying that the Hawks deserve to be favored, only emphasizing that I feel tonight's line is too high. The Hawks are still a talented team. They've got absolutely no pressure on them now and I expect them to play by far their best game of the series. I expect that to be enough for the Hawks to hang within the big number, improving to 7-2 ATS the last nine times that they were coming off three or more consecutive losses. *Annihilator
    Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



    Comment

    • Mr. IWS
      215 Hustler
      • Sep 2006
      • 99936

      #3
      Re: 5-11-09

      Burns MLB

      Baseball (MLB)

      ARIZONA

      Game: Cincinnati Reds vs. Arizona Diamondbacks Game Time: 5/11/2009 9:40:00 PM Prediction: Arizona Diamondbacks Reason: I'm laying the price with ARIZONA. I successfully played on the Reds against St. Louis a few days ago, on 5/8. At the time, they were coming off a 6-5 victory over Milwaukee the previous day. I stated that I felt that they would carry that positive momentum with them into the St. Louis series. Sure enough, they began the series with a solid 6-4 victory. In fact, they followed it up with another victory on Friday, their third straight. However, they came back down to Earth yesterday, suffering a tough 8-7 loss in extra innings. I say "tough" as they had rallied back to tie the game with two runs in the bottom of the ninth, only to come up short in the 10th. Those kind of losses can be deflating ("momentum killing") and that's particularly true for a team which has been dealing with some recent injury and "flu bug" issues. While the Reds saw their winning streak snapped yesterday, the Diamondbacks are in the opposite position, as they snapped a 3-game losing streak with a 10-8 victory over the Nationals. While the Reds loss was a deflating one, I believe that's the type of win that Arizona can build momentum from. Not only did they give their new manager his first victory but they also pounded out a whopping 17 hits. That's just what the doctor ordered, for a team which had been struggling at the plate. While I believe that the Diamondbacks have a significant "situational advantage," I also expect them to have an edge on the mound. Garland gets the call and he's been superb lately. Last time out, he tossed seven shutout innings. In his previous start, he allowed just two runs through 6 1/3 innings. Overall, the Diamondbacks have gone a profitable 5-1 (+4.9) in his six starts and he's averaging better than six innings per outing. Arroyo goes for the Reds and he lasted only one inning in his last start. That was long enough for him to give up a whopping nine earned runs though. He pitched well in his previous start but was also rocked for nine runs in the start prior to that. That brings him to 1-2 with a terrible 11.04 and 1.977 WHIP over his last three starts. Arroyo is 0-1 with a 4.13 ERA and 1.458 WHIP vs. Arizona. On the other hand, Garland is 1-0 with a sparkling 1.13 ERA and 0.625 WHIP vs. the Reds. His lone start against them came back in 2006 and he allowed only one run through eight complete innings. I expect Garland to deliver another solid performance and I look for the Dbax to start the series with a victory. *Personal Favorite
      Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



      Comment

      • Mr. IWS
        215 Hustler
        • Sep 2006
        • 99936

        #4
        Re: 5-11-09

        Brandon Lang

        20 Dime: NUGGETS (plus the points vs. Mavericks)



        5 Dime: Braves-Mets UNDER the total ... NOTE: List both Johan Santana and Derek Lowe as starting pitchers
        Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



        Comment

        • Mr. IWS
          215 Hustler
          • Sep 2006
          • 99936

          #5
          Re: 5-11-09

          ROOT

          CC--------------------------Denver Nuggets
          Mill Club------------------San Fran.Giants
          Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



          Comment

          Working...