UFC 152

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • poopoo333
    replied
    Luke, we may as well put our new BetDSI bankroll as well as our $500 free play bank roll on Jones here.

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    Wow, Jones under -500?
    Yeah..surprised. He is going to win and I want to bet it.

    But after today, I hope the Karate Kid gets teh fastest KO in UFC history

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Wow, Jones under -500?

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    Vladdy/Hamill is going to be one boring ass fight.

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    What?
    Lmfao

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by poopoo333
    Vladdy Matyushenko Steps in to Face Matt Hamill at UFC 152....

    What?

    Leave a comment:


  • edman5555
    replied
    Originally posted by MMA_scientist
    Probably Svino is the only one here that actually does the math. I just use a calculator on the internet. But for me it is more clear to think in terms of odds... like rather than -200, I think 2:1... But everything everyone is describing is really just lazily converting it and deciding if it is accurate. Saying "I just think about my confidence on fighter and how steep the line on him is then decide if it is worth it" is the exact same thing, just less precise. That said, that's pretty much what I do too.
    I never do it. To me it almost doesn't matter how you look at it. I know what -200 pays out and I can estimate a fighters probability of winning and compare the two.

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    Vladdy Matyushenko Steps in to Face Matt Hamill at UFC 152
    ....

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    Demetrious Johnson vs Joseph Benavidez - 5 rounds - UFC 152 propositions
    Sat 9/22 1003 Johnson/Benavidez goes 5 round distance -300
    10:30PM 1004 Fight won't go 5 round distance +220
    Sat 9/22 1005 Johnson wins inside distance +1170
    10:30PM 1006 Not Johnson inside distance -2510
    Sat 9/22 1007 Johnson wins by 5 round decision +310
    10:30PM 1008 Not Johnson by 5 round decision -430
    Sat 9/22 1009 Benavidez wins inside distance +282
    10:30PM 1010 Not Benavidez inside distance -402
    Sat 9/22 1011 Benavidez wins by 5 round decision -120
    10:30PM 1012 Not Benavidez by 5 round decision -120
    Sat 9/22 1013 Johnson/Benavidez draw +6000
    10:30PM 1014 Fight not a draw -15000
    Brian Stann vs Michael Bisping - 3 rounds - UFC 152 propositions
    Sat 9/22 1103 Stann/Bisping goes 3 round distance -145
    10:30PM 1104 Fight won't go 3 round distance +105

    Leave a comment:


  • Svino
    replied
    I think the time you really need to be careful about percentages is when combining multiple bets on one fight, so you can add percentages together and see what total odds you are effectively betting.

    Leave a comment:


  • MMA_scientist
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. IWS
    I gotta be honest, I dont even know how to do the percentage thing.
    Probably Svino is the only one here that actually does the math. I just use a calculator on the internet. But for me it is more clear to think in terms of odds... like rather than -200, I think 2:1... But everything everyone is describing is really just lazily converting it and deciding if it is accurate. Saying "I just think about my confidence on fighter and how steep the line on him is then decide if it is worth it" is the exact same thing, just less precise. That said, that's pretty much what I do too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. IWS
    replied
    Originally posted by mike
    i never do the percentage thing and convert it to a line. its how confidence i am on certain fighter to win the fight and how steep the line on him is then decide how much i want to bet. though i never bet on a guy with great odds if i dont think he has at least 1 clear way to win. But i think Stan will edge Bisping standing and Bisping is going to have to take stan down to beat him. Bisping td is overrated tho, imo. From what i remember, he usually able to get guys down after they starting to gas. otherwise, his td isnt that good. I think stan beats him.
    I gotta be honest, I dont even know how to do the percentage thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Svino
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    Speaking of setting a percentage for each fight and then converting that into a moneyline, does anyone really do that anymore?
    That's what I do for the main card fights (or matches where I feel pretty confident in my memory of both fighters).

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    In my opinion, Bisping is the better striker as well as a better grappler..I really think Stann's actual kickboxing ability is very overrated

    Leave a comment:

Working...