UFC 162

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zY|
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 8385

    Originally posted by SPX
    So . . . that Anderson Silva . . . he never really was very good, was he?
    His only good win is old man Dan Henderson. Other than that, he's a glorified can crusher in the weakest division in MMA.

    How'd I do?
    Triple-six killers in this motherfucker runnin shit

    Comment

    • Luke
      10 year vet
      • Oct 2006
      • 30060

      Originally posted by zY|
      His only good win is old man Dan Henderson. Other than that, he's a glorified can crusher in the weakest division in MMA.

      How'd I do?
      That would be Dana's exact speech if he left tomorrow for another organization
      2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP


      Comment

      • Svino
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 3873

        Originally posted by MMA_scientist
        It is criminal how uninformed MMA judges are. After talking to some other clueless people, the only plausible explanation is that Kennedy was on "top" of Roger, even though Roger was on his back.
        It may have been "punch counting". Kennedy supposedly landed 20 total strikes, Roger 8. I think judges just fall back to counting strikes.

        • If one guy outlanded the other, I always try to keep open the possibility that some judges will score it for him, whatever else happened.
        • If one guy was on top for more of the round, I always try to keep open the possibility that some judges will score it for him, whatever else happened.

        Comment

        • edman5555
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 6628

          "Anderson's rematch is fair; the guy ruled the division for a long time. He maybe didn't really want to fight for the belt again but the UFC demanded it. I believe it wasn't only Anderson's intentions that prevailed in this situation." - Lyoto Machida
          1 unit = 300 $

          Comment

          Working...