2014 Off Topic Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    I loved both of those also but I'd still rank Aviator above them. Truth be told , I'm a big Leo fan. I'd also rank his Shutter Island over them, but that's just my opinion
    Fun fact: DiCapprio has never won an Oscar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    I miss stats class

    Leave a comment:


  • MMA_scientist
    replied
    Originally posted by trotterz
    You are just missing information in there. You would need the amount of cases per lawyer in front of each judge IMO to get the correct correlation. Then you could get a correct analysis
    well I do have that information, just didn't want to post it all unless it was needed. Assume that the judges are 45%, 47%, 50%, 52%, and 55%. Further assume each lawyer has the same number of cases with each judge (so at 200 cases a piece, each lawyer has 40 cases with each judge).

    Leave a comment:


  • trotterz
    replied
    Originally posted by MMA_scientist
    svino, could I get some non-gambling related math help?

    I don't know how to express the question in the right terms, sorry. Here is the issue: There are 5 disability judges, each grants benefits between 45% and 55% or the time. There are 600 cases. If three lawyers each handled 200 cases and had individual approval rates of 54%, 56%, and 61%-- would that indicate something that is normal variance (just chance) or is there some indication of an advantage (ie one lawyer is "better" than the others)?

    I know I can't ask the question right. Sorry.

    If it is a lot of work just tell me to fuck off.
    You are just missing information in there. You would need the amount of cases per lawyer in front of each judge IMO to get the correct correlation. Then you could get a correct analysis

    Leave a comment:


  • MMA_scientist
    replied
    svino, could I get some non-gambling related math help?

    I don't know how to express the question in the right terms, sorry. Here is the issue: There are 5 disability judges, each grants benefits between 45% and 55% or the time. There are 600 cases. If three lawyers each handled 200 cases and had individual approval rates of 54%, 56%, and 61%-- would that indicate something that is normal variance (just chance) or is there some indication of an advantage (ie one lawyer is "better" than the others)?

    I know I can't ask the question right. Sorry.

    If it is a lot of work just tell me to fuck off.

    Leave a comment:


  • MMA_scientist
    replied
    I like Leo ok, I wouldn't say I'm a huge fan of his acting or anything. I don't see a movie just because he is in it, but I have seen almost all his movies. He does a pretty good job, and he generally shuts the fuck up outside of his movies which helps me see him as a character more I think (as opposed to someone like Sean Penn, who I think used to be a good actor, but his terrible real life personality ruins anything I see with him in it now). I think more than anything, he picks good movies. He has been in a ton of good stuff. Inception and The Departed are both super awesome flicks IMO. I think I saw the Aviator, but it didn't really stay with me, probably because I don't really like Biopics that much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. IWS
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    I loved both of those also but I'd still rank Aviator above them. Truth be told , I'm a big Leo fan. I'd also rank his Shutter Island over them, but that's just my opinion
    Im a big Leo fan too. I think the best of My generation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. IWS
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    You said you were going to download it and watch it..........Phillip Seymour Hoffman...........bueller?
    Oh yea, dam, I forgot haha. Ill grab it this weekend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Svino
    OK, I just had one of those "Damn, where does all the time go" moments when you said The Aviator came out a full decade ago.

    I had to look it up to convince myself it wasn't more like 4 or 5 years.
    Yeah, 10 years . Sad thing is I've meant to watch it for about 10 years but I always thought it was a sappy Titanic, Pearl Harbor type movie


















    edmann

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    Catch Me If You Can and The Departed were both better performances.
    I loved both of those also but I'd still rank Aviator above them. Truth be told , I'm a big Leo fan. I'd also rank his Shutter Island over them, but that's just my opinion

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. IWS
    Huh?
    You said you were going to download it and watch it..........Phillip Seymour Hoffman...........bueller?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. IWS
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    Owning Mahoney report?
    Huh?

    Leave a comment:


  • Svino
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    Watched a movie called The Aviator yesterday .If you havent seen it , watch it. Its about 10 years old and probably Dicaprio's best performance I've ever seen. Solid 9 out of 10 in my book. Can't believe I hadn't seen it before yesterday
    OK, I just had one of those "Damn, where does all the time go" moments when you said The Aviator came out a full decade ago.

    I had to look it up to convince myself it wasn't more like 4 or 5 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    Watched a movie called The Aviator yesterday .If you havent seen it , watch it. Its about 10 years old and probably Dicaprio's best performance I've ever seen. Solid 9 out of 10 in my book. Can't believe I hadn't seen it before yesterday
    Catch Me If You Can and The Departed were both better performances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. IWS
    I just saw it a couple weeks ago. Excellent Movie.
    Owning Mahoney report?

    Leave a comment:

Working...