UFN 74: Holloway vs Oliveira

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SPX
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 23875

    #16
    Originally posted by CriticalHit
    He really had quite a few squandered opportunities to turn around or even win the DHK fight. Cote's more durable and if Burkman has more brain farts then it's probably an easy Cote decision through wrestling. It's kinda strange to think of Burkman and Cote fighting in the UFC in 2015.
    Hey, welcome to the forum! Cool username.

    I really think Cote is shot as a fighter. That doesn't mean he can't win fights, but let's say if he and Fitch fought today I have little doubt Fitch would beat him. And I'm not trying to get MMAthematical up in here, but it just seems to me that Burkman is at a better place in his career and is experiencing something of a resurgence. Whereas Cote is getting soundly beaten by Cung Le, KOd by Sakara and has to rely on a robbery to beat Voelker.

    But yeah, it is weird to think that these guys are facing off in the UFC in 2015.
    I heart cock

    Comment

    • CriticalHit
      Member
      • Aug 2015
      • 53

      #17
      Originally posted by SPX
      Hey, welcome to the forum! Cool username.

      I really think Cote is shot as a fighter. That doesn't mean he can't win fights, but let's say if he and Fitch fought today I have little doubt Fitch would beat him. And I'm not trying to get MMAthematical up in here, but it just seems to me that Burkman is at a better place in his career and is experiencing something of a resurgence. Whereas Cote is getting soundly beaten by Cung Le, KOd by Sakara and has to rely on a robbery to beat Voelker.

      But yeah, it is weird to think that these guys are facing off in the UFC in 2015.
      Thanks, just dipping my toe in. I got invited by someone on another forum.

      Anyways, Cote is def. over the hill. I agree with Voelker getting robbed and him basically being near out even before the Sakara hammerfists.

      He also fights alot smarter now though. Mostly he sticks to grinding out fights with his wrestling and has dropped brawling completely. Burkman's a strange case. He was making great strides in his technique in his WSOF stint and had some solid wins, esp. the Fitch upset. What makes me less confident in him in this match up is his tendency to make mistakes and get complacent when he doesn't get the early finish and has to go through grueling clinch and ground work like against Carl and DHK. Cote is going to do his best to make this ugly and point score.

      I'm not counting Burkman out, don't get me wrong. It just seems like a match up that can screw Josh with judging by leaving 2 rounds too up in the air by fighting Cote's fight. I'm pulling for him since a loss probably gets the axe again.

      Comment

      • Luke
        10 year vet
        • Oct 2006
        • 30060

        #18
        Originally posted by CriticalHit
        It's kinda strange to think of Burkman and Cote fighting in the UFC in 2015.

        Ain't that the truth? Just think Cote fought for the UFC title once. No wonder Silva's reign was so long

        And welcome to the place, man
        2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP


        Comment

        • SPX
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 23875

          #19
          Originally posted by CriticalHit
          Thanks, just dipping my toe in. I got invited by someone on another forum.
          Well it's good to have you around. We're kind of in a re-building phase right now so good, thoughtful posters are exactly what we need. We should have a contest coming up pretty soon that should be fun and an opportunity win a bit of $ so stick around.


          Originally posted by CriticalHit
          Anyways, Cote is def. over the hill. I agree with Voelker getting robbed and him basically being near out even before the Sakara hammerfists.

          He also fights alot smarter now though. Mostly he sticks to grinding out fights with his wrestling and has dropped brawling completely. Burkman's a strange case. He was making great strides in his technique in his WSOF stint and had some solid wins, esp. the Fitch upset. What makes me less confident in him in this match up is his tendency to make mistakes and get complacent when he doesn't get the early finish and has to go through grueling clinch and ground work like against Carl and DHK. Cote is going to do his best to make this ugly and point score.

          I'm not counting Burkman out, don't get me wrong. It just seems like a match up that can screw Josh with judging by leaving 2 rounds too up in the air by fighting Cote's fight. I'm pulling for him since a loss probably gets the axe again.
          I agree that this is far from a lock for either guy. If Cote wins, I’m not exactly going to be shocked. But I do think the momentum is with Burkman at this point in their careers. Again, not to get MMAthematical, but I have a suspicion that Lombard would’ve killed Cote whereas Burkman was able to keep it fairly competitive thoughout.

          You make some good points about Burkman getting caught in long, grinding wars and not responding well to that. That’s something to consider. I need to go back and watch his more recently fights.
          I heart cock

          Comment

          • CriticalHit
            Member
            • Aug 2015
            • 53

            #20
            Originally posted by Luke
            Ain't that the truth? Just think Cote fought for the UFC title once. No wonder Silva's reign was so long

            And welcome to the place, man
            MW has come a long way for sure.

            Thanks
            Originally posted by SPX
            Well it's good to have you around. We're kind of in a re-building phase right now so good, thoughtful posters are exactly what we need. We should have a contest coming up pretty soon that should be fun and an opportunity win a bit of $ so stick around.




            I agree that this is far from a lock for either guy. If Cote wins, I’m not exactly going to be shocked. But I do think the momentum is with Burkman at this point in their careers. Again, not to get MMAthematical, but I have a suspicion that Lombard would’ve killed Cote whereas Burkman was able to keep it fairly competitive thoughout.

            You make some good points about Burkman getting caught in long, grinding wars and not responding well to that. That’s something to consider. I need to go back and watch his more recently fights.
            Yeah, Burkman would have tossed Cote around the cage and gotten an eventual gnp stoppage I suspect esp. considering he was roided up.
            Last edited by CriticalHit; 08-18-2015, 05:57 PM.

            Comment

            • SPX
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 23875

              #21
              Originally posted by Luke
              Ain't that the truth? Just think Cote fought for the UFC title once. No wonder Silva's reign was so long
              Originally posted by CriticalHit
              MW has come a long way for sure.
              Ha, yeah. Funny to think that Marquardt, Cote and Leites were once the best the division had to offer as far as guys who weren't Anderson Silva. Now we have Weidman, Rockhold, Machida, Jacare, Romero, etc.
              I heart cock

              Comment

              • CriticalHit
                Member
                • Aug 2015
                • 53

                #22
                I have to admit, Leites had me believing he might put a run together towards another title shot. I knew Bisping would be a rough matchup though with that constant movement, volume striking, and TDD(still a very competitive fight).

                Nate is done and Cote will follow him before the end of 2016 I think.

                Comment

                • Luke
                  10 year vet
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 30060

                  #23
                  Was just thinking: if you're going to take Oliveira, you may as well take him by sub. Its +325 vs +200. Oliveira only has one win that's not by sub in the last 5 years
                  2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP


                  Comment

                  • SPX
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 23875

                    #24
                    Originally posted by CriticalHit
                    I have to admit, Leites had me believing he might put a run together towards another title shot. I knew Bisping would be a rough matchup though with that constant movement, volume striking, and TDD(still a very competitive fight).

                    Nate is done and Cote will follow him before the end of 2016 I think.
                    I don't want to take anything away from Leites. He's been doing very well and has had a very successful late career resurgence. No idea where he goes from here but I suppose there's no reason to think he can't continue to win fights for at least a handful of years to come.

                    As for Nate, yeah, I think he's done. It's unfortunate. When I saw him destroy Woodley for the SF belt I was like, "Nate the Great is fucking BACK!" And now he's gone like 1-5 since then.
                    I heart cock

                    Comment

                    • SPX
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 23875

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Luke
                      Was just thinking: if you're going to take Oliveira, you may as well take him by sub. Its +325 vs +200. Oliveira only has one win that's not by sub in the last 5 years
                      That's not a bad idea, especially against someone like Holloway who is primarily a striker.
                      I heart cock

                      Comment

                      • CriticalHit
                        Member
                        • Aug 2015
                        • 53

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Luke
                        Was just thinking: if you're going to take Oliveira, you may as well take him by sub. Its +325 vs +200. Oliveira only has one win that's not by sub in the last 5 years
                        Yeah, that's by far the most likely way he wins. I'm still extremely impressed by the ground wizardry against Hioki. Hioki's UFC career def. didn't pan out well but submitting him is a huge feather to have in your cap.

                        Oliveira will do some funky things to get it to the ground too. I wouldn't be surprised if he started things off with a flying guard pull or a scissor sweep.

                        Comment

                        • poopoo333
                          MMA *********
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 18302

                          #27
                          I won't bet big on Burkman/Cote at all. At most to win $100. Not the type of fight I will bet big on. Luke and I learned our lessons betting on...wait or it..

                          BUMS. (SORRY X)

                          I think Oliveira is the play after watching fights. His wrestling has came a long way. My biggest concern is how he tends to fold/quit when things get kind of rough. I really don't think he likes getting hit.

                          Best play on this fight IMO: Fight does not go distance. It's -300 but...fuck it.

                          Comment

                          • CriticalHit
                            Member
                            • Aug 2015
                            • 53

                            #28
                            Oliveira def. has had a tendency to wilt in the past. He did fight on against Lentz in the rematch despite having trouble seeing and that was a grueling fight on the other hand.

                            Comment

                            • Ludo
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 4931

                              #29
                              Originally posted by poopoo333
                              I like Burkman to beat Cote. Burkman's fight IQ worries me, but at the current line I'll be betting Burkman. I think he is a better striker than Cote and can/will keep it on the feet.
                              After the fight with Stungun I'd be very hesitant to play Burkman on anything. Dude had a clear advantage striking in that fight, and hurt Stungun every single round in standing exchanges, but insisted on trying to clinch with a guy who's entire game revolves around Judo trips an top control. And despite that, Josh still almost won that fight in a couple spots. Some people just can't be saved from themselves.
                              2013: +8.24u(increased unit size on 5/19)
                              Favorites: 20-6 + 6.13u
                              Underdogs: 10-19 -2.51u
                              Ludo's Locks Parlay Project: +1.4u

                              2012: +20.311u

                              Comment

                              • Éire
                                Member
                                • Aug 2015
                                • 80

                                #30
                                Tough card. I'd stay away from the Holloway fight unless you want to pick the favourite. I personally think Holloway handles Oliveira with ease.
                                "Do I hate my opponents? How could I hate someone who has the same dreams as me?"

                                Comment

                                Working...