2015 Off Topic Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    Well with Room 237, I don't think the director even wants you to take most of the theories seriously, he just wants you to be dumbfounded by the fact that there are even people out there who think like that. But like I said, some of them ARE pretty interesting and thought-provoking.

    I actually have been meaning to go back and watch The Shining and Room 237 back to back.

    Also, that's an interesting note about directors and what "feels" right to them. I'm reading a book right now called "Looking at Movies," which is about formal criticism of film. The authors always stress how the directors are constantly making decisions about elements in the film that are supposed to mean something -- the angle of a shot, the proliferation of a color, the speed of the editing, etc. It has really made me wonder how much of what we see on the screen really is THAT deliberate and how much is not.
    I've seen enough "behind the scenes" interviews where directors have just been like "oh, that? That means nothing, I just thought it looked cool." I'm sure plenty of things are very deliberate, but take things like the elevator filled with blood in the Shining, for instance. I don't personally feel that it "means" much of anything, so much as it seemed like a great shot for the overall feel of the movie and the progression of Jack's psychosis. Or a lot of the imagery in Tim Burton's films. Much of that is just superfluous, even for ambiance and the atmosphere of things, but that's his thing, and it works for him.

    I feel like a lot of directors get caught up in these kinds of theories because so many well known directors love to draw on motif, and inject themes all throughout a film, as if to somehow keep it grounded, or on track. Kind of like authors, to be honest. They can't always tell you what a particular passage or line means. It just felt right, so they kept it in there, and trying to endlessly interpret every bit and piece is a sort of fruitless exercise in redundancy. Some people just need to take things for what they are in the most literal sense, but many times you get these psuedo-intellectuals who have to find the deeper meaning in everything. Sometimes a hole in the ground is just a hole in the ground, you know?.
    Last edited by Ludo; 08-25-2015, 03:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    I'll have to check it out. I'm usually not one for "fan theories", though. I usually just chalk the obscure shit up to artistic license. Half the time the director doesn't even know why he does certain things, it just "feels" right to them.
    Well with Room 237, I don't think the director even wants you to take most of the theories seriously, he just wants you to be dumbfounded by the fact that there are even people out there who think like that. But like I said, some of them ARE pretty interesting and thought-provoking.

    I actually have been meaning to go back and watch The Shining and Room 237 back to back.

    Also, that's an interesting note about directors and what "feels" right to them. I'm reading a book right now called "Looking at Movies," which is about formal criticism of film. The authors always stress how the directors are constantly making decisions about elements in their films that are supposed to mean something -- the angle of a shot, the proliferation of a color, the speed of the editing, etc. It has really made me wonder how much of what we see on the screen really is THAT deliberate and how much is not.
    Last edited by SPX; 08-25-2015, 03:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    The whole documentary is about theories surrounding the movie. Specifically they bring in four people (I think it's four) and all they do is talk over clips of the movie about what they feel this means and that means etc. That probably sounds boring but it's really not.

    Some of the theories sound like crackpot shit but others will actually make you think. The moon landing guy is fascinating.
    I'll have to check it out. I'm usually not one for "fan theories", though. I usually just chalk the obscure shit up to artistic license. Half the time the director doesn't even know why he does certain things, it just "feels" right to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    It took you 3 years after I told you to watch it..........and you were 30 years old! One more excuse and you know what happens........
    You're going to masturbate to one of those nudes you have?

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    Honestly, if I had tried to watch it when I was very much younger I probably would not have been able to appreciate it.
    It took you 3 years after I told you to watch it..........and you were 30 years old! One more excuse and you know what happens........

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Luke
    Still can't believe it took you so long to see 2001.
    Honestly, if I had tried to watch it when I was very much younger I probably would not have been able to appreciate it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    No, but I've seen the shining like 120 times. I didn't know they ever made a documentary concerning it.
    The whole documentary is about theories surrounding the movie. Specifically they bring in four people (I think it's four) and all they do is talk over clips of the movie about what they feel this means and that means etc. That probably sounds boring but it's really not.

    Some of the theories sound like crackpot shit but others will actually make you think. The moon landing guy is fascinating.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    I still need to see Barry Lyndon. Kubrick is the man. I just watched 2001 for the first time a few years ago and it blew me away. I also rewatched The Shining a little while back and then watched the "Shining theory" documentary Room 237. That's an interesting experience.
    Still can't believe it took you so long to see 2001.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    Poor Jared from Subway. He started, and ended his career trying to get into smaller pants.
    I'm sure he'll be getting plenty of 6 inch subs in prison

    What a freak!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    Ha. Did you ever see Room 237?
    No, but I've seen the shining like 120 times. I didn't know they ever made a documentary concerning it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    Poor Jared from Subway. He started, and ended his career trying to get into smaller pants.
    BOL!

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Ludo
    Don't you know you've always been here?
    Ha. Did you ever see Room 237?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    Poor Jared from Subway. He started, and ended his career trying to get into smaller pants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    Originally posted by SPX
    I still need to see Barry Lyndon. Kubrick is the man. I just watched 2001 for the first time a few years ago and it blew me away. I also rewatched The Shining a little while back and then watched the "Shining theory" documentary Room 237. That's an interesting experience.
    Don't you know you've always been here?

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Éire
    I have not. I plan on watching that and Barry Lydon this week though.
    I still need to see Barry Lyndon. Kubrick is the man. I just watched 2001 for the first time a few years ago and it blew me away. I also rewatched The Shining a little while back and then watched the "Shining theory" documentary Room 237. That's an interesting experience.

    Leave a comment:

Working...