UFN 20 Bets

[triathlete]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

These three... I could do without. . . I could also do without this ass shaving clip. . .

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

wtf is this dumb crap?

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

LOL

You should go judge on the Sherdog forums then, you biased a-hole.

Maybe the difference between us is that I don't believe in 10-8 rounds. I think either you won the round or you didn't. Plus, Simpson never actually got dropped. He was wobbled but never dropped, and it's not like he didn't land any shots of his own.

I give Lawlor round one, Simpson round 2 by a hair, and Simpson dominated round 3 (though admittedly not like Lawlor dominated round 1).

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

That Bud Light commercial trips me out.

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

You don't believe in 10-8 rounds?

So if I land 2 more leg kicks than you it counts the same as if I beat you within an inch of your life?

You might want to reevaluate that line of thinking.

Not to mention, whether or not you personally believe in them, the commision DOES, therefore they are legit scoring criteria. I'm scoring the fight within the focus of the rules.

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

You don't believe in 10-8 rounds?

So if I land 2 more leg kicks than you it counts the same as if I beat you within an inch of your life?

You might want to reevaluate that line of thinking.

Not to mention, whether or not you personally believe in them, the commision DOES, therefore they are legit scoring criteria. I'm scoring the fight within the focus of the rules.

Even so, I think I gave legitimate reasons for why it wasn't a 10-8. Lawlor never even dropped Simpson. For a 10-8, you'd have to do more damage in my opinion.

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Come on, Dun Ham!

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Actually you didn't give any reasons at all until now, LOL.

If that wasn't 10-8 then they don't exist. Knockdowns don't matter, this isn't boxing.

Whatever. Are you on Dunham or Efrain?

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Actually you didn't give any reasons at all until now, LOL.

If that wasn't 10-8 then they don't exist. Knockdowns don't matter, this isn't boxing.

Whatever. Are you on Dunham or Efrain?

First off, I said: "Plus, Simpson never actually got dropped. He was wobbled but never dropped, and it's not like he didn't land any shots of his own." Those are reasons.

Second, don't pretend like knockdowns don't matter in the judges minds. They do.

Third, I'm on Dunham. So cheer for my boy, bitch!

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Fuck it. If it was 5 rounds like it should've been he clearly would've lost anyways.

Oh well, unless something crazy happens Tom will get a nice FOTN bonus.

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Efrain looks good. Dunham's showing some better-than-expected takedown defense.

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

See Efrain dropped him and nearly finished him but that was still 10-9

[triathlete]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Dunham is looking much, much better...

[zY|]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Fun fight. Seems like Efrain decided to stop fighting.

[SPX]

Re: UFN 20 Bets

Got that one 1-1.

If Dunham wins then I will finish this night at least mildly profitable even if Maynard loses.