Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

[Luke]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

[quote=MMA_scientist]

Why? Rogers is way bigger than him.

Overeem is so obviously chemically enhanced my balls shrink just looking at him.


[/quote:2rg2t8iy]


yeah no doubt he's been on roids

[zY|]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

All I'm saying is the fact that he gained at most 30 pounds in 5 years is not really indicative of anything.

Not that it matters, I think steroids should be allowed anyways.

[SPX]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

All I'm saying is the fact that he gained at most 30 pounds in 5 years is not really indicative of anything.

Not that it matters, I think steroids should be allowed anyways.

That looks like more than 30 pounds. . .

[MMA_scientist]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

look at the size of his head. Has he been lifting weights with his skull? There is like a little pre-roid Overeem face inside a giant head. It is painfully obvious...

plus the context clues: not fighting in the US, and he is a pos/cheater- hitting CroCop in the balls on purpose. Now that he is coming back to the U.S. to fight, word is that he has lost like 10-15 pounds. quick, someone call Encyclopedia Brown to crack the case.

I didnt realize you were one of those "roids should be legal" guys.

[MMA_scientist]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

All I'm saying is the fact that he gained at most 30 pounds in 5 years is not really indicative of anything.

30 pounds? in his traps...

[Luke]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

I think steroids should be allowed anyways.

wow I am totally against roids.Why should people who dont want a huge head and enlarged heart and small testes be put at a disadvantage against someone that wants to die by 55?

[MMA_scientist]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

I think steroids should be allowed anyways.

wow I am totally against roids.Why should people who dont want a huge head and enlarged heart and small testes be put at a disadvantage against someone that wants to die by 55?

Agreed. Its like, "hey, I am going to be on PCP for this fight... I will feel nothing and I will have super human rage strength. In public, it would take 5 police officers to restain me, mace will have no effect. If you want to compete, I suggest you pay the price of glory too..."

[Mr. IWS]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

I thought is was the horse meat diet Ubereem was on?

You guys see his brother's last fight? Looks like he is on the horse meat too.

[zY|]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

Well there's no arguing against hearsay, rumors, blanket statements, and generalities.

[Mr. IWS]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

Team Brett Rogers saying commission will use olympic style testing on Alistair Overeem

Dam, what will Vadim and the crazy russians say if he passes that shit?

[zY|]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

[quote=MMA_scientist]

All I'm saying is the fact that he gained at most 30 pounds in 5 years is not really indicative of anything.

30 pounds? in his traps...[/quote:2khnw3fs]

He was cutting 20 pounds to make 205 in 2003 and now he weighs in around 250. Do you need a calculator? I realize sensationalizing is so much fun though.

[SPX]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

wow I am totally against roids.Why should people who dont want a huge head and enlarged heart and small testes be put at a disadvantage against someone that wants to die by 55?

I think that the case against steroids is far from open and shut due to a lack of testing and research.

A good documentary on the subject is Bigger, Stronger, Faster. It's pretty fair in that it presents both sides of the coin--the filmmakers don't say that steroids are good for you, but they present compelling information that, if taken properly (under the guidance of a doctor, for instance), they can be safe.

Again though, another point it makes is that the medical community simply has refused to research the long-term effects of steroids, so most of the negative press, as zY says, is based on hearsay and speculation.

[SPX]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

He was cutting 20 pounds to make 205 in 2003 and now he weighs in around 250. Do you need a calculator? I realize sensationalizing is so much fun though.

I've gained 20 pounds in the last few years and it's barely noticeable.

[Mr. IWS]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

A good documentary on the subject is Bigger, Stronger, Faster.

seen it, very good.

I read the wrestler guy died last year.

[MMA_scientist]

Re: Strikeforce HEAVY ARTILLERY- MAY 15, 2010

[quote=zY|][quote="MMA_scientist":3kbe2b3f]

All I'm saying is the fact that he gained at most 30 pounds in 5 years is not really indicative of anything.

30 pounds? in his traps...[/quote:3kbe2b3f]

He was cutting 20 pounds to make 205 in 2003...[/quote:3kbe2b3f]

yeah because what Overeem says he was cutting is so much more believable than photo evidence.

Also, nice try, but Overeem weighed in at 205 at Pride 33 in Febraury 2007. In June of 2008, he was 241. Not exactly the 5 pounds of muscle a year for 6 years theory you tried to sell us.

In 11/07 for a HW fight, no cutting, he was 224. 8 months later- he was 241 shredded- 17 pounds of muscle in 8 months.

I realize it is fun to make crap up and pretend you know what you are talking about and then try to pretend everyone else is just speculating... but it is pretty evident you are full of shit.