If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think a lot of noise is made about the gi, but I don't really think it makes that big a difference. You see it in bjj all the time. All the best no-gi grapplers are gi trained (Marcelo Garcia, for example, trains 5 days in the gi and 1 day without the gi).
The problem I have with Judo is how they have gone to an extremely limited rule set to distinguish itself from wrestling and bjj. I actually used to do judo and I like it for what it is. But they recently outlawed double legs and the traditional kata garuma (fireman's carry). You are not allowed to attack teh legs on a first attack, you can grab the leg to counter though. You can only grip both hands on the same side of the gi for like 5 seconds. The sport focuses too much on its cannonized techniques and not enough on pure effectiveness.
As SPX mentioned, the ground work is extremely limited, and a lot of it is focused on stalling. For what its worth, I have rolled with about a dozen judo blackbelts and all of them were whitebelt to blue level on the ground, I had zero problem with any of them. That said, it is well known that the judo ground work level varies a lot- probably about as much as the takedown level vaires in bjj. It is just not a big part of judo. Just as takedowns are not a huge part of bjj, although they are part of the sport.
As far as judo v wrestling... wrestling encompasses everything judo has. The reverse is not true. Judo is too concerned about its traditions and the beuaty of the throws. Wrestling is about getting the guys down, period.
The problem I have with Judo is how they have gone to an extremely limited rule set to distinguish itself from wrestling and bjj. I actually used to do judo and I like it for what it is. But they recently outlawed double legs and the traditional kata garuma (fireman's carry). You are not allowed to attack teh legs on a first attack, you can grab the leg to counter though. You can only grip both hands on the same side of the gi for like 5 seconds. The sport focuses too much on its cannonized techniques and not enough on pure effectiveness.
As SPX mentioned, the ground work is extremely limited, and a lot of it is focused on stalling. For what its worth, I have rolled with about a dozen judo blackbelts and all of them were whitebelt to blue level on the ground, I had zero problem with any of them. That said, it is well known that the judo ground work level varies a lot- probably about as much as the takedown level vaires in bjj. It is just not a big part of judo. Just as takedowns are not a huge part of bjj, although they are part of the sport.
This is true, but I feel that I should stress that just because this is what's going on in the competitive world, doesn't mean that this is what the rules are going to be in your dojo.
At my dojo, there were both judo and BJJ instructors, so some of the BJJ ended up carrying over into the judo. So in addition to the pure judo groundwork, you'd also see the occasional triangle and shit like that. Also, my instructors came from wrestling backgrounds, too, and that was obvious in some of the throws and reversals that they taught.
During randori, you were given the latitude to do whatever you wanted, provided the technique wasn't particularly unsafe. So you'd see the whole gamut of judo techniques and a lot of stuff that probably wasn't textbook judo. Hell, there was a Hapkido guy in my class, and from time to time we'd even throw punches and kicks at each other. My instructor didn't give a fuck.
I guess my point is this: 95% of your training time is spent in the dojo, under your instructors training methods, so if you have a good instructor all those stupid ass competition rules are only hindrances on competition day.
I guess my point is this: 95% of your training time is spent in the dojo, under your instructors training methods, so if you have a good instructor all those stupid ass competition rules are only hindrances on competition day.
Agreed. It all depends on where you train. To me Judo offers the takedowns and the groundwork, so in that sense it is the most complete grappling art. But the takedowns are not as good as wrestlers and the mat work is not as good as bjj stylists, IMO. But that's what happens... because the other arts focus almost exclusively on those aspects.
Still, Judo is legit and I have nothing but respect for most judoka. For self defense, I think judo might be the best honestly. You see guys get ended with a throw and the ground work is more than enough for your average guy.
Still, Judo is legit and I have nothing but respect for most judoka. For self defense, I think judo might be the best honestly. You see guys get ended with a throw and the ground work is more than enough for your average guy.
This is pretty much where it's at.
I see it as kind of like mixed martial artists: MMA fighters will rarely be as good at striking as K-1 guys, or as good at matwork as pure BJJ guys, or as good at wrestling as pure wrestlers, but they're more well-rounded than any of them and are better at going with the fight regardless of what territory the fights goes into.
Comment