Ufn 24
Collapse
X
-
They are passively interested in the outcome a lot of times. Also biased a lot of times. On top of that the pros picks don't equal out to actual bets they would make if they were gambling. They are just asked to pick the outcome of a fight. We get the luxury of saying I don't know and not betting. They usually don't. Bottom line though, knowledge = most important part of success. A former fighter/coach should have the most potential for gambling.
It is more about synthesis of information IMO, than it is about knowledge.
Aside from that, fighters usually are not the most knowledgeable guys IME. They have the ability to make thier body do, but that doesn't really mean that they have looked at the intricacies of leverage and force. Coaches would be better IMO, but even then, I don't know how much of an edge it would be.Comment
-
You know who I think would make great gamblers... economists. I fancy myself an amateur economist, and I even wrote my thesis on the law and economics. But I am shit compared to some of these guys, they can literally predict the future by looking at all possible outcomes and explanations for things. For a quick and popular peek into this way of thinking, check out the book Freakonomics. It came out after i got out of school, but I didn't really understand the full power of economist -style analysis until I read it and got re-interested. It is not an academic read, it is just a soft peek into the mind of an economist.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
I have never owned a piece of mma clothing either. I do have this shirt, but I don't think it counts as MMA apparel:
Comment
-
Comment