Ufc 130

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Luke
    10 year vet
    • Oct 2006
    • 30060

    Originally posted by MMA_scientist
    "Sorry guys, I fucked up and let the judges decide my fate. Johnson did a good job and had a great game plan... Rewatched my fight, think I won based on effective attacks, sweeps & position control... Thanks to Sherdog, Heavy, Bloody Elbow, & MMAJunkie for scoring the fight in my favor. Bad judging can't hold me down, I will be back." -Miguel Torres, Johnson was just defending all through out, I still think Torres should've won.


    "Sherdog(all 3 Judges) Bloody Elbow, Heavymma and MMA rising all gave the fight to Miguel Torres. What did you guys think? ...Over 2500 people voted on who they think won between Torres and Johnson. 77% say Torres... Its a shame the judges don't seem to understand the ground game." -Firas Zahabi, Yep. They should learn that being on top is an advantage in a sense that it is easier to score points, but it doesn't really mean that you already are.
    We know judges give rds to the guy on top all the time so I don't know what else to say.MMA judges blow and always have but we do know they give rds to the guy being agressive and missing than to the guy backing up and connecting on punches , we also know they will give rds to the guy on top rather than the guy actually doing work. Its not right but that's how things are, I've been burned myself plenty of times the same way
    2015 MMA BETTING CHAMP


    Comment

    • Svino
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 3873

      I don't like it when journalists call fights according to their own criteria as opposed to how the fights are actually going to be scored. What the Sherdog guys do on their site isn't judging, it's activism. I may agree with them on preferences, but you've gotta judge the sport that exists, not the one you wish existed.

      Comment

      • SPX
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 23875

        Well to be fair, if they're judging via the actual criteria that's in place, then I don't see what the problem is.
        I heart cock

        Comment

        • Svino
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 3873

          Originally posted by SPX
          Well to be fair, if they're judging via the actual criteria that's in place, then I don't see what the problem is.
          I think the criteria as simply stated in words is open to so wide an interpretation that the only way to understand how MMA fights are truly judged is to go by actual experience.

          Comment

          • SPX
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 23875

            I agree that it's open to interpretation and subjective judgment.
            I heart cock

            Comment

            • MMA_scientist
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 9857

              Originally posted by Svino
              I think the criteria as simply stated in words is open to so wide an interpretation that the only way to understand how MMA fights are truly judged is to go by actual experience.
              I don't think that is correct. The good judges (Blatnick) have always scored fights correctly. We can't let guys like Cecil Peeples set a precedence that has to be followed. The law is what it is... it is the job of the individual judge to apply the law to the facts. The rules don't give a preference to top position, just because it is consistently applied incorrectly, doesn't mean that it "creates law" that must be followed. The site journalists sadly know much more about MMA than most of the judges. The problem is that we just need some judges that know what they are looking at.

              As Luke mentioned, it happens in striking battles too (Sanchez/Kampmann, anything involving Garcia)... aggression is a criteria (zY will be in shortly to tell us all the actual criteria), but it should not outweight actual effective striking. Also, taking a guy down and holding him is like the opposite of aggression, it is stalling. It is not effective grappling, it is a big nothing. I think they should get credit for the takedown just for dictating where it will go (but no more credit than a guard pull unless it does some damage). After that, you get nothing for just being on top.

              As I said on fight night, DJ did pass guard, and much of the time he was working on guard passing. In fact, if it was a grappling match, DJ would have won by a large margin. I am not blaming him... It just pisses me off because it is so wrong and easily mended.
              2012: +19.33
              2012 Parlay project: +16.5u

              Comment

              • poopoo333
                MMA *********
                • Jan 2010
                • 18302

                Originally posted by MMA_scientist
                In fact, if it was a grappling match, DJ would have won by a large margin.
                UFC 130 Aftermath: Johnson vs Torres Under Submission Grappling Scoring

                Comment

                • MMA_scientist
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 9857

                  Thanks I hadn't seen that. I thought it would be a wider margin, but I was thinking there were more takedowns. I take issue with half guard being a positional advance though... a lot of guys sweep better from half guard (not torres) and half guard is hard to define. Some buterfly could be considered a half guard...

                  That said, you can't score MMA like a grappling match. The match would have been totally different under grappling rules... for one, Torres would have pulled guard most likely and negated the points for the takedown. For two, Torres would not have had such urgency to escape and thus probably would not have been passed. He really was not so much passed as his submission attempt got thrown off. Torres would beat DJ in a grappling match, no question. BUt this is MMA. I was just making the point that DJ was trying to advance his position, unlike a lot of guys on top.
                  2012: +19.33
                  2012 Parlay project: +16.5u

                  Comment

                  • poopoo333
                    MMA *********
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 18302



                    Despite broken leg, UFC's Demetrious Johnson expects a speedy return

                    Comment

                    • poopoo333
                      MMA *********
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 18302

                      Jon Jones is apparently close to making his return to action to defend his light heavyweight title for the first time, as he may be penciled in to battle Quinton Jackson at the upcoming UFC 135 event, which is currently rumored for Sept. 24 at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado.
                      A source close to one of the fight camps alerted MMAmania.com to the news earlier today, but stressed that obstacles exist. Jones, who is still resting a hand injury, must first be cleared by his physician before getting the green light to compete.
                      The same goes for "Rampage," who was recently medically suspended until June 28 but could stretch as far as Nov. 25 unless he gets clearance from an orthopedic doctor.

                      Comment

                      • poopoo333
                        MMA *********
                        • Jan 2010
                        • 18302

                        Is anybody giving Rampage a chance?

                        Comment

                        • SPX
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 23875

                          A hard puncher like Rampage always has a chance . . . probably not much of one, though.
                          I heart cock

                          Comment

                          • poopoo333
                            MMA *********
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 18302

                            Yeah I think Jones is going to destroy him. I would like to see Rampage win though

                            Comment

                            • SPX
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 23875

                              I honestly think that if anyone is going to beat Jones in the near future, it will be Machida.
                              I heart cock

                              Comment

                              • Mr. IWS
                                215 Hustler
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 98698

                                Originally posted by SPX
                                I honestly think that if anyone is going to beat Jones in the near future, it will be Machida.
                                I agree.
                                Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



                                Comment

                                Working...