2015 Off Topic Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SPX
    replied
    Supporting Evidence









    1. The Creatures' Appearance - As the writer of the original demon theory post states, these guys don't appear to be space-farers but rather "clawed, naked beast creatures." We would expect legitimate aliens to be highly intelligent and masters of technology. If that's the case, why would they come down to a foreign planet wearing no protective gear? Are they just perfectly attuned to our atmosphere and climate? And do they have no knowledge of their weakness to water? Furthermore, demons have long been depicted as having claw-like hands with long-sharp nails.

    2. "Alien craft" Not Detected by Radar - Okay, this piece of evidence is fairly weak, but it's something to consider. When the lights in the sky appear over Mexico City, the newscaster makes it a point to say that the activity was not detected by radar. Since these are supposedly highly advanced aliens it would make sense that they would have cloaking technology, there's something about the way the newscaster says it--I believe he says it twice in fact--that makes you wonder if there's something more significant about this statement. We never do see a craft, only lights. So is this a way of telling us that there is no actual physical craft at all and the whole thing is an act of deception?

    3. The Creatures Aren't in the Alien Book - This is another fairly weak argument but one that I find interesting. Early in the movie Morgan goes to a bookstore and buys a book on extra-terrestrials and this is essentially the source that's used to learn all that we know about aliens. Some of the information sounds legitimate, but other information seems dubious (i.e. tin-foil hats keep the aliens from reading people's minds) so it's hard to know how much we can trust this book. But one thing to note is that there are a variety of depictions of aliens in the book. All of these pictures show a creature that appears much like the classic Grey. And none of these pictures looks anything like the creatures that are now invading earth.

    4. The Water Theory "Sounds Made Up" - At one point Graham tells Merrill and the kids about Ray Reddy's water theory. Ray doesn't have any real reasoning beyond the fact that the creatures haven't been seen much near water, that's it. Morgan says the idea "sounds made up" and Merrill and Bo agree that it doesn't sound right. One thing to keep in mind here is that, as I mentioned earlier, from the beginning Morgan has been our conduit of information about the creatures. He was the one who first tuned into the signal on the baby monitor. He is the one who realizes that the crop circles are used for navigation. He is the one who provides what little information we have about the creatures' possible motivations. He is the Keeper of the Book. So when he reacts negatively--almost violently--to the water theory, it may be something we are supposed to listen to. I know you're saying, "But wait! It WAS water that defeated the aliens!" I know, I know. I'm getting to that.

    5. Bo is Special - We'll have to take this one in parts.

    * Early on it's revealed that when the creatures are nearby, animals tune into this and lose their minds. They go rabid. During this earliest incident Morgan has to kill the family dog. After he does it, Morgan says, "He tried to kill Bo." Not "He tried to kill ME," but "he tried to kill Bo." Why would the dog want to kill Bo? Is there something special about Bo? Was the dog somehow being influenced by the creatures to kill her because she is dangerous to them? The original theory post says that Bo is referred to both as "holy" and as "an angel." I didn't catch a reference to her holiness, but she is told that when she was born she was "LIKE an angel." Is she like an angel literally, in her nature? If the creatures are in fact demons (i.e. fallen angels) then it would make sense that they'd put extra effort into attacking her.

    * Bo has a special relationship with water. Every glass of water she touches she decides there's something wrong with it and she wants a new glass, which leads to lots of glasses of water being left around the house. It is these glasses of water that are ultimately used to defeat the invading creature at the end. It's always BO'S WATER, not just any water. Is there something special about Bo's water? Is the original theorist correct that Bo--perhaps by her angelic nature--has infused each glass with her angelic nature, transforming it into HOLY WATER? Because if we pay attention, there's never another mention anywhere in the movie of water actually causing harm to any of the creatures. The viewer may assume that there is, because of the conversation with Ray Reddy earlier, but its effectiveness is never confirmed outside of the Hess household. Which leads me to my final point. . .

    * Near the beginning of the film, as illustrated by my gif, Bo comes up to her dad and says, "There's a monster outside my room. Can I have a glass of water?" This is long before water is ever discussed as any sort of weapon, but thinking about it in hindsight it is VERY CLEAR that Bo is not asking for something to drink here, she's asking for something to protect herself. Bo somehow already KNOWS that water (or perhaps only her water?) is effective in warding off these entities, further proving that she has some sort of supernatural powers.

    6. Three Cities in the Middle East - At the end of the movie there's a final TV broadcast where the newscaster says (and I might be paraphrasing this very slightly), "Three cities in the Middle East found a method to defeat them using a primitive method." Take careful note that it does not say WATER was used. It says three cities "in the Middle East" (the home of the Holy Land) found success using "a primitive method." Merely throwing small amounts of water on something has never been known as an effective method of attack, but the use of holy water is an ancient and primitive method that has traditionally been used in spiritual warfare. And the reaction that the creature has near the end when water is thrown on him is not unlike the reaction that demon-possessed people supposedly have when coming in contact with holy water.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied





    The Demon Theory



    For those who are not familiar with the demon theory, go ahead and read this first:



    Last night while watching the movie I kept a notebook nearby and jotted down two columns of information: Detracting Evidence and Supporting Evidence. I hope these headings are self-explanatory.

    The question here is: Can the aliens in the film be read as demons--either in addition to or instead of ETs, and did M. Night intentionally encode this double-meaning into the film? Ever since running into the demon fan theory I've been meaning to go back and watch the movie with the theory in mind, and now I've finally done it. I'll first present the evidence, as I see it, that is presented in the film and then give my personal conclusion.

    To make this easier and so that no one will get confused by the names, here's the cast of characters we're dealing with:

    Graham (Mel Gibson) - The Father
    Merrill (Joaquin Phoenix) - The Uncle / Graham's Younger Brother
    Morgan (Rory Culkin) - Graham's Son / The Little Brother
    Bo (Abigail Breslin) - Graham's Daughter / The Little Sister


    First I'd like to deal with the detracting evidence which goes against the theory and get that out of the way.



    Detracting Evidence









    1. The Baby Monitor - During a crucial scene in the movie, in which the family as a whole begins to realize that they are dealing with something not of the this world, they pick up signals on a baby monitor. Morgan realizes that these signals are the creatures talking (presumably over some kind of radio frequency, perhaps between ships). It's confirmed later that this is clearly a form of verbal communication, leading one to ask the question, What sort of demons have a verbal language? And how is it that their voices can be picked up on a baby monitor?

    2. The Creatures Are Clearly Corporeal - When we think of demons, we don't think of flesh-and-blood beings with extensions in time and space; rather, we think of disembodied spirits with no physical bodies. But the creatures in Signs clearly are physical in nature, or at least have the ability to manifest physically. There are a number of things that point to this but the most important is this: In the scene at Ray Reddy's house when the creature is locked in the pantry, Graham chops off two of its fingers. Not only this, but at the end of the movie this same creature--missing its fingers--comes back, and not only comes back, but also uses a physical weapon on Morgan (the poison gas), implying a reliance on technology.

    3. Navigation - Morgan, who is often the character providing us with key pieces of information throughout the movie (and reliably so, I think), tells us that the real purpose of the crop circles is for navigation. The creatures use them to know where they're supposed to be and how to get there. Why would demons need such navigational clues?

    4. The Movie Tells Us It's Aliens - This point is pretty obvious. The movie comes right out and SAYS, "Hey guys, we're dealing with aliens here." So it is of course on the shoulders of the theorist to prove that there's more going on here than we are being told by the movie's creator and its characters.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    So after our previous discussion about Signs I decided to give it another look. It had been quite a few years since I had last seen it. Maybe 10. Long enough at least that, while I remembered the general plot, I had forgotten a lot of the details and could never quite remember what comes next.

    So what I'm going to do in this thread is give a brief review on this film after re-visiting it after so many years, and then dive into an examination of the well-known "demon" theory and see how this holds up after a fresh viewing.

    Without further ado.











    Mini-Review:


    There's so much going on this movie. It's a sci-fi film about an alien invasion (or is it? wait, we'll get to that later), it's a film about one man who has lost his spiritual faith, it's a film about a brother who can't seem to get his life on track, it's a film about a family that is trying to hold itself together after a terrible tragedy. . .

    There are several stories going on at once here--all separate but all intertwined--and all told with skilled craft. But the main thread that runs through the whole movie is that of faith. Do we live in a godless world or is there a reason to believe that something greater is out there? In fact, while Signs is often considered a movie about invading aliens, I'd argue that the aliens are ultimately just a plot device that allows us to explore what the movie is REALLY about -- faith and the bonds of a family in trying times.

    Signs is every bit as good as I remember it being. The criticism about the water twist is legitimate, but in my view it's a small thing that is overpowered by the movie's many strengths. This is a film full of HEART that manages to simultaneously bring "the feels" while also creating an atmosphere of suspense and, occasionally, outright dread. This was M. Night at his best.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    The fuck happened to Eire? That dude showed up, posted like a thousand times in a week, and then disappeared.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by poopoo333
    "Am I going to hell for texting about gambling in a church at a viewing?"

    -Luke

    I see no problem with this.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Went and saw The Visit. 7/10

    Good but not great. Kind of slow to ramp up and really get going, but overall I enjoyed it.

    Had some good moments of humor and moments of suspense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    ^^^^ That's so wrong.......but Lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by poopoo333
    "Am I going to hell for texting about gambling in a church at a viewing?"

    -Luke
    BOL!!! My family would have killed me had they knew what I was doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • poopoo333
    replied
    "Am I going to hell for texting about gambling in a church at a viewing?"

    -Luke

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    I legit do think we're in the middle of a holy war. Islam is making sure of that shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludo
    replied
    We need some holy hand grenades.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    The Christian Assault Rifle















    Psalms 144:1 on one side










    The Templar Cross of the Crusaders on the other







    Last edited by SPX; 09-09-2015, 04:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SPX
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. IWS
    Looks a little more on the "scary" side than what He normally puts out. But Id watch just because Its an M. Knight film.

    Apparently it's actually more of a horror comedy from what the reviews say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. IWS
    replied
    Looks a little more on the "scary" side than what He normally puts out. But Id watch just because Its an M. Knight film.

    Leave a comment:

Working...