WEC 52

[zY|]

Re: WEC 52

Why is that? Because they consistently score most fights correctly? I agree. Shitty.

Actually just the opposite .Most close fights they score wrong

You are talking out of your ass again. Point me to the last close fight they scored wrong.

And besides, I never said it was the ultimate arbiter. It's a tool like any other.

[SPX]

Re: WEC 52

How you feel about it is irrelevant. The unified rules specifically state 'effective grappling' and 'effective striking' as the main scoring criteria. Submission attempts are effective grappling, missed strikes are not.

Oh, my bad, I didn't realize that attempting a technique and failing at it was "effective" in MMA.

[sbjj]

Re: WEC 52

Let me ask you this: Should a punch that doesn't land be granted any points? I guess you could say it constitutes "aggression" but beyond that, obviously not. That's how I feel about submission attempts that don't do any sort of actual damage, like cutting off someone's air, hurting a joint, etc.

How you feel about it is irrelevant. The unified rules specifically state 'effective grappling' and 'effective striking' as the main scoring criteria. Submission attempts are effective grappling, missed strikes are not.

But the argumant was over what defines a sub attempt. SPX pretty much only counted a deep attempt, while Scientist counted a guy wraping his legs around another guy.

[sbjj]

Re: WEC 52

How you feel about it is irrelevant. The unified rules specifically state 'effective grappling' and 'effective striking' as the main scoring criteria. Submission attempts are effective grappling, missed strikes are not.

Oh, my bad, I didn't realize that attempting a technique and failing at it was "effective" in MMA.

True, I guess you could consider almost hitting a guy effective striking if you wanted to.

[SPX]

Re: WEC 52

But the argumant was over what defines a sub attempt. SPX pretty much only counted a deep attempt, while Scientist counted a guy wraping his legs around another guy.

Right. I would be happy to note the value of a submission attempt that has some sort of damaging residual effect after the defender has escaped. But merely going for a kimura that the other guy pops right out of? Whatever.

[Luke]

Re: WEC 52

You are talking out of your ass again. Point me to the last close fight they scored wrong.

.

Cerrone-Henderson I
Penn-Edgar I
Kampmann -Shields

Thats just the top of my head. Most of the time when a fight is even slighty close they just put it as a draw ,like I said they are worthless .


Your own words:

Yeah, you're right.

Sometimes they're spot on, other times not so much.

Also, I'm a faggot.

[Luke]

Re: WEC 52

LOL @ SPX and the edit

[Mr. IWS]

Re: WEC 52

Strong venom in this thread.

[SPX]

Re: WEC 52

LOL @ SPX and the edit

Don't know what you're talking about. . .

[zY|]

Re: WEC 52

[quote=Luke]

You are talking out of your ass again. Point me to the last close fight they scored wrong.

.

Cerrone-Henderson I
Penn-Edgar I
Kampmann -Shields

Thats just the top of my head. Most of the time when a fight is even slighty close they just put it as a draw ,like I said they are worthless .


Your own words:

Yeah, you're right.

Sometimes they're spot on, other times not so much.

Also, I'm a faggot.

[/quote:33k1nmya]

LOL

You are clownshoes, as usual.

[zY|]

Re: WEC 52

How you feel about it is irrelevant. The unified rules specifically state 'effective grappling' and 'effective striking' as the main scoring criteria. Submission attempts are effective grappling, missed strikes are not.

Oh, my bad, I didn't realize that attempting a technique and failing at it was "effective" in MMA.

I'm not talking about your gay philosophy crap, I'm talking about the goddamn rules.

[SPX]

Re: WEC 52

LOL

You are clownshoes, as usual.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

[Luke]

Re: WEC 52

LOL

You are clownshoes, as usual.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

That means he knows he's wrong and doesnt want to admit it

[Luke]

Re: WEC 52

Right. I would be happy to note the value of a submission attempt that has some sort of damaging residual effect after the defender has escaped. But merely going for a kimura that the other guy pops right out of? Whatever.

Dont I remember you arguing that Cerrone deserved rd 1 in his first fight with Hendo because of his submission attempts? Or was that Zy ? Or was that not even rd 1 of that fight lol?

[zY|]

Re: WEC 52

LOL

You are clownshoes, as usual.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

That means he knows he's wrong and doesnt want to admit it

It means you and your argument are a walking joke, not worthy of my time.