I just have a very hard time seeing any of the 3 losing. I keep going back and forth on which has the greatest chance of a loss. But it just really comes down to OTHER people making a case for the loss. I just think these are 3 terrible matchups for the underdogs.
Hominick backers talk of how he is the best striker Aldo has faced. Well, Mark has also been tagged and hurt by fighters that were at least 2 levels below Aldo. Bottom line, Hom. is there to be hit, and he will be hit.
Couture backers talk about how he is going to stall or take Machida down....Seriously? Why was this gameplan not used more efeectively against Big Nog.
Shields backers talk of how he is the best wrestler(takedowns wise) that GSP has faced. Problem is that I have already heard that 2 times before with Fitch and Kos. If Shields had not beat Henderson, and his first fight in the UFC was Kamp...this line would be GSP -900.
Hominick backers talk of how he is the best striker Aldo has faced. Well, Mark has also been tagged and hurt by fighters that were at least 2 levels below Aldo. Bottom line, Hom. is there to be hit, and he will be hit.
Couture backers talk about how he is going to stall or take Machida down....Seriously? Why was this gameplan not used more efeectively against Big Nog.
Shields backers talk of how he is the best wrestler(takedowns wise) that GSP has faced. Problem is that I have already heard that 2 times before with Fitch and Kos. If Shields had not beat Henderson, and his first fight in the UFC was Kamp...this line would be GSP -900.
Comment