ROBERT FERRRINGO
SUNDAY NFL SELECTIONS
****** Take #408 Minnesota (+3.5) over Detroit (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: This is my NFL Game of the Month.
This right here is the quintessential Fade The Public pick. Right now no one in the NFL is getting more love than the Detroit Lions. And hey, I admit, this team has played damn well going back to the end of last year. However, I don't think that this squad should be this heavy of a road favorite against a better-than-they-seem Vikings team. I think that Minnesota is going to win this game outright and I think that we have found a side that is reserved for the sharpest of players (with the strongest of stomachs).
I went back and watched the tape of the Detroit-Kansas City game from last week and I was stunned. I don't ever remember a time in my handicapping career where I was watching a 48-3 game and thinking, "You know, the team that lost really could have won this game." But that is the truth. With just over five minutes left in the third quarter of that game the Lions and Chiefs had the EXACT SAME yardage. But Detroit was up 20-3 and would be up 27-3 by the end of the quarter before the Chiefs just started packing it in. Why the score discrepancy if each team had moved the ball equally? Turnovers. Kansas City had four turnovers. But they weren't really caused by Detroit. On the first, the KC defender intercepted a potential pick-six - on the first possession of the game, mind you - and then promptly dropped the ball, turning it right back over to Detroit. The next two turnovers were interceptions. But both of those bounced right off receivers hands and right into Detroit hands. They were both flukes. The fourth was a roughing the kicker penalty that kept a Detroit drive alive (the same as a turnover). Further, the Chiefs aided a Detroit touchdown drive with back-to-back 15-yard penalties. So KC did absolutely everything that they could to give that one to Detroit.
However, when KC wasn't kicking itself in the balls, they were playing alright. The Chiefs ran the ball at will and weren't really forced into anything by the Detroit defense. I think that Minnesota will be able to run the ball just as effectively.
Minnesota has had just the opposite happen in the first two weeks. I felt like for all but two quarters they have outplayed both San Diego and Tampa Bay. And in both games they have had leads in the fourth quarter. And, honestly, they led both games despite getting next to nothing out of quarterback Donovan McNabb, who is missing a ton of throws. I think that McNabb will be sharper this week. I think that the Minnesota front four is going to get way more pressure on Detroit than either Kansas City (and Tamba Hali got a ton last week) or Tampa Bay did in the first two weeks. I think that the Vikings are going to play like their season is on the line (it is; they can't fall 0-3) and I think that the savvy and experience of Donovan McNabb is going to come out this week against inexperienced Matt Stafford.They should be able to control the ball and the clock and I think that this very veteran, experienced Vikings team is going to relish playing in the underdog role. The Lions may be improving, but they haven't done enough to scare the NFC North rivals that have been pounding them for two decades.
***.5 Take #400 New Orleans (-4) over Houston (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
I don't think there is any doubt that the Saints are the better team and they should be revved up to pound the Texans. With the exception of the first quarter of the opener, the Saints have outplayed Green Bay and Chicago the last two weeks. In the meantime, Houston has been getting extended training camp, playing against hapless Indianapolis and then catching Miami on a short week in a hangover spot. Make no mistake about it: Miami should have won last week against the Texans. They played horrendously in the first quarter but then dominated the action. And were it not for two missed chippy field goals and a late fumble at midfield (in the fourth quarter of a 16-13 game, at a time when the Fins had all the momentum) then I think Houston would have lost last week. The Texans defense has been playing over its head and has benefited from facing a pair of awful quarterbacks. But this week Drew Brees and the boys should be ready to pick up where they left off against Chicago and Green Bay and should roll in this spot.
**.5 Take #406 Tennessee (-6.5) over Denver (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this to a 2-Unit Play.
I loved this game when I first saw the line. However, the fact that Denver is 0-2 ATS and Tennessee is 1-0-1 ATS gave me some pause. But I am firmly on record as saying that Tennessee is my sleeper team in the AFC and that I think they are going to be a moneymaker throughout the year. I thought that this line was a red flag. The books were virtually begging people to take the points and roll with Denver (mainly because everyone is still operating under the foolish notion that the Titans aren't any good). But Tennessee put it on a good Baltimore team last week. And they should be able to pick up where they left off this week against a very banged-up Denver team. The Broncos played without five starters and had two more injured last week. They are getting some guys back, but none of them are 100 percent and this team isn't in flow. They are traveling east and making their first road start of the game. And I'm not sure that they are ready for this spot against a team on the rise. Matt Hasselbeck is on the verge of clicking with his guys in a big way, and Chris Johnson is ready to break out after facing two very physical fronts. I think this week things could start coming together and I believe this line is this big for a reason.
**.5. Take #421 Green Bay (-3.5) over Chicago (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this to a 2-Unit Play.
I don't think there is any doubt who the better team is in this spot. The Packers have owned the Bears in recent years, going 5-2 ATS in the last seven meetings and 10-3 in their last 13 games int eh Windy City. The Packers may have gotten off to a slow start against Carolina last week because they were looking forward to this game. I don't think there is any doubt that they will be focused and sharp in this one. Chicago's Cover-2 defense won't be able to hold back the Packers in this game. The Cover-2 is effective against inaccurate quarterbacks and against ultra-athletic, physical players in the red zone. Green Bay has exactly that. On the flip side, Chicago's offensive line is a disaster and their game plan is a bit of a joke. The Packers and Dom Capers should be able to force Jay Cutler into some compromising positions and if Chicago loses the turnover battle (which I predict they will) then they don't stand a chance to win. Look, either the Bears are going to play above themselves and win this game outright or the Packers are going to roll. I am willing to throw down on the defending champions because their talent, scheme, and momentum right now are much better than the home team's.
**.5 Take #411 Kansas City (+14.5) over San Diego (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this play to a 2-Unit Play.
This play is really a tie-in with what I put in my Minnesota writeup. The Chiefs did not play nearly as poorly as the final score indicated last week. Now they are back on the road facing a team that is off its own double-digit loss. That fits them perfectly into a system that is 23-13-1 over the last 21 years: play on any double-digit underdog on the road after a loss when playing an opponent after a double-digit loss. The entire public will be jumping on the Chargers here in anticipation of a blowout. It's not poor reasoning. But the reality is that the Chargers, according to my models, have nearly as much of a chance of losing this game outright (13 percent) as they do winning by 17 or more points (19 percent). That leaves us in the middle, and I can see the Chiefs hanging around. Kansas City is 10-2 ATS as a double-digit underdog and the Chargers are just 2-8 ATS as a double-digit favorite. These are divisional foes and there is plenty of venom here. I think the Chiefs put up a fight and hang within this number.
*.5 Take #418 Tampa Bay (-1.5) over Atlanta (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Bump this up to a 2-Unit Play.
We had the Eagles last week as a big public fade. The Falcons were getting worked over, getting lit up by 10 at home in a game that was supposed to represent some emotional Super Bowl for Atlanta. Then Mike Vick got injured and the Falcons took advantage of some turnovers and good luck to get a four-point win. Well, now the Falcons are back on the road and I think that Tampa Bay is going to be focused and ready to go. Just like with our move with Green Bay, I think that Tampa Bay might have been looking ahead to this game and that is why they got off to a slow start. But just like the Packers, Tampa Bay was good enough - and good enough at the QB spot - to engineer a comeback. Atlanta has not impressed me at all and I think that they might be one of the more overrated teams in the league right now. Tampa Bay is young and cocky and I think that they are more focused and more confident at the moment. Atlanta is in a clear letdown spot and I think that this will be an ambush. This game will be tight. But the number is set up so that Tampa just has to win - by a field goal or whatever - in order to cash for us.
* Take #413 N.Y. Jets (-3.5) over Oakland (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
*** TEASER: Take #397 New England (-1.5) over Buffalo (1 p.m.) AND Take #423 Pittsburgh (-3.5) over Indianapolis (8:20 p.m.)
** TEASER: Take #403 Miami (+9.5) over Cleveland (1 p.m.) AND Take #419 Arizona (+4) over Seattle (4 p.m.)
This Week's Totals
*** Take 'Under' 40.5 San Francisco at Cincinnati (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
* Take 'Under' 41.0 Miami at Cleveland (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
*-Unit Play. Take 'Under' 41.0 N.Y. Jets at Oakland (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
* Take 'Over' 42.0 Denver at Tennessee (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
** Take #403 Miami (+3) over Cleveland (1 p.m.). I recommend buying up to the 3.0 on this game.
SUNDAY NFL SELECTIONS
****** Take #408 Minnesota (+3.5) over Detroit (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: This is my NFL Game of the Month.
This right here is the quintessential Fade The Public pick. Right now no one in the NFL is getting more love than the Detroit Lions. And hey, I admit, this team has played damn well going back to the end of last year. However, I don't think that this squad should be this heavy of a road favorite against a better-than-they-seem Vikings team. I think that Minnesota is going to win this game outright and I think that we have found a side that is reserved for the sharpest of players (with the strongest of stomachs).
I went back and watched the tape of the Detroit-Kansas City game from last week and I was stunned. I don't ever remember a time in my handicapping career where I was watching a 48-3 game and thinking, "You know, the team that lost really could have won this game." But that is the truth. With just over five minutes left in the third quarter of that game the Lions and Chiefs had the EXACT SAME yardage. But Detroit was up 20-3 and would be up 27-3 by the end of the quarter before the Chiefs just started packing it in. Why the score discrepancy if each team had moved the ball equally? Turnovers. Kansas City had four turnovers. But they weren't really caused by Detroit. On the first, the KC defender intercepted a potential pick-six - on the first possession of the game, mind you - and then promptly dropped the ball, turning it right back over to Detroit. The next two turnovers were interceptions. But both of those bounced right off receivers hands and right into Detroit hands. They were both flukes. The fourth was a roughing the kicker penalty that kept a Detroit drive alive (the same as a turnover). Further, the Chiefs aided a Detroit touchdown drive with back-to-back 15-yard penalties. So KC did absolutely everything that they could to give that one to Detroit.
However, when KC wasn't kicking itself in the balls, they were playing alright. The Chiefs ran the ball at will and weren't really forced into anything by the Detroit defense. I think that Minnesota will be able to run the ball just as effectively.
Minnesota has had just the opposite happen in the first two weeks. I felt like for all but two quarters they have outplayed both San Diego and Tampa Bay. And in both games they have had leads in the fourth quarter. And, honestly, they led both games despite getting next to nothing out of quarterback Donovan McNabb, who is missing a ton of throws. I think that McNabb will be sharper this week. I think that the Minnesota front four is going to get way more pressure on Detroit than either Kansas City (and Tamba Hali got a ton last week) or Tampa Bay did in the first two weeks. I think that the Vikings are going to play like their season is on the line (it is; they can't fall 0-3) and I think that the savvy and experience of Donovan McNabb is going to come out this week against inexperienced Matt Stafford.They should be able to control the ball and the clock and I think that this very veteran, experienced Vikings team is going to relish playing in the underdog role. The Lions may be improving, but they haven't done enough to scare the NFC North rivals that have been pounding them for two decades.
***.5 Take #400 New Orleans (-4) over Houston (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
I don't think there is any doubt that the Saints are the better team and they should be revved up to pound the Texans. With the exception of the first quarter of the opener, the Saints have outplayed Green Bay and Chicago the last two weeks. In the meantime, Houston has been getting extended training camp, playing against hapless Indianapolis and then catching Miami on a short week in a hangover spot. Make no mistake about it: Miami should have won last week against the Texans. They played horrendously in the first quarter but then dominated the action. And were it not for two missed chippy field goals and a late fumble at midfield (in the fourth quarter of a 16-13 game, at a time when the Fins had all the momentum) then I think Houston would have lost last week. The Texans defense has been playing over its head and has benefited from facing a pair of awful quarterbacks. But this week Drew Brees and the boys should be ready to pick up where they left off against Chicago and Green Bay and should roll in this spot.
**.5 Take #406 Tennessee (-6.5) over Denver (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this to a 2-Unit Play.
I loved this game when I first saw the line. However, the fact that Denver is 0-2 ATS and Tennessee is 1-0-1 ATS gave me some pause. But I am firmly on record as saying that Tennessee is my sleeper team in the AFC and that I think they are going to be a moneymaker throughout the year. I thought that this line was a red flag. The books were virtually begging people to take the points and roll with Denver (mainly because everyone is still operating under the foolish notion that the Titans aren't any good). But Tennessee put it on a good Baltimore team last week. And they should be able to pick up where they left off this week against a very banged-up Denver team. The Broncos played without five starters and had two more injured last week. They are getting some guys back, but none of them are 100 percent and this team isn't in flow. They are traveling east and making their first road start of the game. And I'm not sure that they are ready for this spot against a team on the rise. Matt Hasselbeck is on the verge of clicking with his guys in a big way, and Chris Johnson is ready to break out after facing two very physical fronts. I think this week things could start coming together and I believe this line is this big for a reason.
**.5. Take #421 Green Bay (-3.5) over Chicago (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this to a 2-Unit Play.
I don't think there is any doubt who the better team is in this spot. The Packers have owned the Bears in recent years, going 5-2 ATS in the last seven meetings and 10-3 in their last 13 games int eh Windy City. The Packers may have gotten off to a slow start against Carolina last week because they were looking forward to this game. I don't think there is any doubt that they will be focused and sharp in this one. Chicago's Cover-2 defense won't be able to hold back the Packers in this game. The Cover-2 is effective against inaccurate quarterbacks and against ultra-athletic, physical players in the red zone. Green Bay has exactly that. On the flip side, Chicago's offensive line is a disaster and their game plan is a bit of a joke. The Packers and Dom Capers should be able to force Jay Cutler into some compromising positions and if Chicago loses the turnover battle (which I predict they will) then they don't stand a chance to win. Look, either the Bears are going to play above themselves and win this game outright or the Packers are going to roll. I am willing to throw down on the defending champions because their talent, scheme, and momentum right now are much better than the home team's.
**.5 Take #411 Kansas City (+14.5) over San Diego (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Lower this play to a 2-Unit Play.
This play is really a tie-in with what I put in my Minnesota writeup. The Chiefs did not play nearly as poorly as the final score indicated last week. Now they are back on the road facing a team that is off its own double-digit loss. That fits them perfectly into a system that is 23-13-1 over the last 21 years: play on any double-digit underdog on the road after a loss when playing an opponent after a double-digit loss. The entire public will be jumping on the Chargers here in anticipation of a blowout. It's not poor reasoning. But the reality is that the Chargers, according to my models, have nearly as much of a chance of losing this game outright (13 percent) as they do winning by 17 or more points (19 percent). That leaves us in the middle, and I can see the Chiefs hanging around. Kansas City is 10-2 ATS as a double-digit underdog and the Chargers are just 2-8 ATS as a double-digit favorite. These are divisional foes and there is plenty of venom here. I think the Chiefs put up a fight and hang within this number.
*.5 Take #418 Tampa Bay (-1.5) over Atlanta (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
Note: Bump this up to a 2-Unit Play.
We had the Eagles last week as a big public fade. The Falcons were getting worked over, getting lit up by 10 at home in a game that was supposed to represent some emotional Super Bowl for Atlanta. Then Mike Vick got injured and the Falcons took advantage of some turnovers and good luck to get a four-point win. Well, now the Falcons are back on the road and I think that Tampa Bay is going to be focused and ready to go. Just like with our move with Green Bay, I think that Tampa Bay might have been looking ahead to this game and that is why they got off to a slow start. But just like the Packers, Tampa Bay was good enough - and good enough at the QB spot - to engineer a comeback. Atlanta has not impressed me at all and I think that they might be one of the more overrated teams in the league right now. Tampa Bay is young and cocky and I think that they are more focused and more confident at the moment. Atlanta is in a clear letdown spot and I think that this will be an ambush. This game will be tight. But the number is set up so that Tampa just has to win - by a field goal or whatever - in order to cash for us.
* Take #413 N.Y. Jets (-3.5) over Oakland (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
*** TEASER: Take #397 New England (-1.5) over Buffalo (1 p.m.) AND Take #423 Pittsburgh (-3.5) over Indianapolis (8:20 p.m.)
** TEASER: Take #403 Miami (+9.5) over Cleveland (1 p.m.) AND Take #419 Arizona (+4) over Seattle (4 p.m.)
This Week's Totals
*** Take 'Under' 40.5 San Francisco at Cincinnati (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
* Take 'Under' 41.0 Miami at Cleveland (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
*-Unit Play. Take 'Under' 41.0 N.Y. Jets at Oakland (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
* Take 'Over' 42.0 Denver at Tennessee (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 25)
** Take #403 Miami (+3) over Cleveland (1 p.m.). I recommend buying up to the 3.0 on this game.
Comment