UFC on Versus 5

[mike]

oh i see. wtf, how much u gonna make betting 25 bucks on a -225 line -.-

[Luke]

Way to take it out of context. How bout an mma reference then. Would you of layed 1600 to win 80 on james toney to not sub randy couture? Don't get me wrong, although i cant foresee hardy ever subbing lytle, I wouldnt be able to risk that much of my bankroll on a return of such little money.

I wouldnt lay 1600 to win 80 on anything besides "will the summer come up tomorrow"

[Svino]

guys, how come the listed limit on bmaker is $500 but if i bet winelind/benavediz over 2.5, they will only let me make a $25 max bet?

That sounds like a mistake (It lets me go over $25). Not sure what's happening, but I'd contact BookMaker and see what's up.

[mike]

yeah so i get this message "Amount In Side Exceeded. Limit For This Game is 25.00 USD". I think they only let me bet the winning amount up to 25 bucks. so i can make a $55 to win $25 bet but can not make a $40 to win $26 bet.

[Svino]

yeah so i get this message "Amount In Side Exceeded. Limit For This Game is 25.00 USD". I think they only let me bet the winning amount up to 25 bucks. so i can make a $55 to win $25 bet but can not make a $40 to win $26 bet.

Ah OK. I get that too, now. Maybe we've got to wait.

BTW, can anyone remember if a UFC bantamweight fight ever been +125 to go over 1.5 rounds like Figueroa vs. Reinhardt is?

[Mr. IWS]

I only bet NBA, NFL, MLB, Boxing/MMA, and WWE.

Bol at WWE

[MMA_scientist]

I wouldnt lay 1600 to win 80 on anything besides "will the summer come up tomorrow"

I think you guys are missing the point. Normally, I wouldn't lay a -2000 bet either. But, just like any other long parlay, the last bet in your parlay, you are technically risking all of the money you built up in the previous bets.
So in a Wiseman Special... you might risk .01 to win 100u... but on the last bet of the parlay, you are really risking a shitload of money on a fight (it varies depending on the line, but if the last bet was -200, you would be risking 67 units). No one goes "OMG, you are crazy, how can you risk 67 units on that one fight?"

This bet is the last bet in a long line of bets that lead up to it. And when it wins, I will take the $1680, and roll on. So if it helps, you can think of it as $400 to win $1200 on "Not Toney sub, not Diaz by sub, not X by Sub, not A by sub, not B by sub, not C by sub, not D by sub... Not Hardy by sub" Because that's exactly the bet that I have made. If you wouldn't think the original parlay was crazy, you can't think this is crazy. That said, you are free to think the original bet was stupid. It may be.

[edman5555]

Ah OK. I get that too, now. Maybe we've got to wait.

BTW, can anyone remember if a UFC bantamweight fight ever been +125 to go over 1.5 rounds like Figueroa vs. Reinhardt is?

Reinhardt vs zhang was like +300 to complete 1 or 1.5 rounds. I bet it and lost.

[Luke]

I think you guys are missing the point. Normally, I wouldn't lay a -2000 bet either. But, just like any other long parlay, the last bet in your parlay, you are technically risking all of the money you built up in the previous bets.
So in a Wiseman Special... you might risk .01 to win 100u... but on the last bet of the parlay, you are really risking a shitload of money on a fight (it varies depending on the line, but if the last bet was -200, you would be risking 67 units). No one goes "OMG, you are crazy, how can you risk 67 units on that one fight?"

This bet is the last bet in a long line of bets that lead up to it. And when it wins, I will take the $1680, and roll on. So if it helps, you can think of it as $400 to win $1200 on "Not Toney sub, not Diaz by sub, not X by Sub, not A by sub, not B by sub, not C by sub, not D by sub... Not Hardy by sub" Because that's exactly the bet that I have made. If you wouldn't think the original parlay was crazy, you can't think this is crazy. That said, you are free to think the original bet was stupid. It may be.

I think its more of I'm a big chicken than thinking the bet is dumb,heck I rarely bet anything over -300 cause I'm afraid of losing money so you can see my hesitation on -2000

[poopoo333]

[poopoo333]

[mike]

damn reinhardt looks to be in good shape for a 41 year old fighter. Cole Miller looks to be in better shape than i remember him being. Noke looks good. Markes looks pretty big himself.

[Vandelay]

lol at 5dimes not offering a no sub or ko in the event anymore. They must have lost alot of money on the no sub thing last week. Also was hoping the cerrone oliveira fight of the night odds were better.

[poopoo333]

Tomorrow night=Lytle's last fight

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44135102

[zY|]

:'(