Strikeforce Dallas June 18th

[Luke]

.

Luke: First off, you're being fucking gay. Second, AA beat Werdum also. Should I put AA ahead of him on the list?

Fail........again . That's not even close to being a good excuse . Werdum lost to AA 4 years ago back when AA was still a top 5 fighter .Werdum just beat Big foot and Fedor in his previous 2 fights before Overeem so how can he be ranked behind them?

[SPX]

"Well, Fedor would win a rematch. That triangle was a fluke."

It was.

[SPX]

Without you getting all crazy and defensive, how do you have Brock @ #8? He was #1 when he lost to Cain. And how is Barnett #5? HE is the guy who has had no top 10 wins...since 2006.

Fail...........Werdum beat Bigfoot and Fedor and somehow he's way behind them in the rankings, ok

I'm just ranking who I think is better than who.

PP: Yeah, Brock was #1, but that #1 ranking was a joke. Kind of like ranking Serra #1 because he beat GSP. In fact, Sherdog refused to do so and put him at #2. Bottom line, I think that if Brock fought them tomorrow, everyone I listed ahead of him would beat him.

Luke: First off, you're being fucking gay. Second, AA beat Werdum also. Should I put AA ahead of him on the list?

[poopoo333]

Fail...........Werdum beat Bigfoot and Fedor and somehow he's way behind them in the rankings, ok

BOL!!! I didn't even notice that. I know SPX is going to respond:

"Well, Fedor would win a rematch. That triangle was a fluke."

[Luke]

What do you mean? I said I thought Cain and JDS take the top 2 spots regardless. But if you want to act like I don't have a right to ask you about a post you made since I didn't submit full rankings, fine, here you go:


1. Cain
2. JDS
3. Bigfoot
4. Fedor
5. Barnett
6. Overeem
7. Werdum
8. Brock
9. Carwin
10. Mir

Fail...........Werdum beat Bigfoot and Fedor and somehow he's way behind them in the rankings, ok

[poopoo333]

Without you getting all crazy and defensive, how do you have Brock @ #8? He was #1 when he lost to Cain. And how is Barnett #5? HE is the guy who has had no top 10 wins...since 2006.

[SPX]

SPX just wants to argue everyone else's opinion but never put his own up.

What do you mean? I said I thought Cain and JDS take the top 2 spots regardless. But if you want to act like I don't have a right to ask you about a post you made since I didn't submit full rankings, fine, here you go:


1. Cain
2. JDS
3. Bigfoot
4. Fedor
5. Barnett
6. Overeem
7. Werdum
8. Brock
9. Carwin
10. Mir

[poopoo333]

Are y'all trying to fuck with me?

Just wondering if you'd take him @-175, calm down bro.

[poopoo333]

I dont care what your rankings are and if that's where you think they should be thats your opinion , just like my opinion is Overeem should be #2 . SPX just wants to argue everyone else's opinion but never put his own up.

No, you're actually right. The only argument I can make for Carwin is that he beat Mir, who was probably #4 or #5 back then, lost to Brock who was ranked higher than him and lost to JDS who was ranked higher than him. So Carwin basically didn't move much. As for Mir..kind of the same thing. He was probably #3 or #4 (what was the seemingly consensus rank on Big Nog before UFC 92?) going into UFC 100, lost to #2 Brock, then beat Kongo which did nothing for him, then lost to Carwin who's last win was Gonzaga (was he top 10 before UFC 96?), then beat Cro Cop and Roy Nelson which basically did nothing.

[SPX]

What if it was -175?

Or -171

Are y'all trying to fuck with me?

[Luke]

What if it was -175?

Or -171

[Luke]

Yeah...awesome point. For some reason when I was making that up, I completely forgot Carwin lost to Brock.

And I don't know. This is what's hard about making MMA rankings. May as well just make rankings for the UFC and Strikeforce. It really does leave too much speculation because those guys don't fight/haven't fought each other.

I dont care what your rankings are and if that's where you think they should be thats your opinion , just like my opinion is Overeem should be #2 . SPX just wants to argue everyone else's opinion but never put his own up.

[poopoo333]

I would be more than happy to take JDS up to, I'd say, -170.

What if it was -175?

[SPX]

JDS won't beet Overeem for so many reasons.

I would be more than happy to take JDS up to, I'd say, -170.

I also don't see what him winning or losing against Cain has anything to do with whether or not he would beat Overeem.

[edman5555]

JDS won't beet Overeem for so many reasons. It doesn't even matter though because JDS isn't going to beat Cain.