UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

You mean the part where Scientist made an exaggeration in which you would get banned because SPX was pissed off at you as though that kind of thing has ever happened here? Or where SPX said that MMA betting involves times where one must refrain from being afraid of a bet simply because of the line if the reasons are good enough? Dude grow some thicker skin, take the skirt off and quit being such a fucking girl already. It's fine and dandy to start attacking people's systems of betting but as soon as someone comes back at you it's all "oh I didn't do anything! Why are you all picking on Me! Stop coming to the rescue already!" Take that shit back to grade school.

As for where I was when that shit was going on, it's simple. For one they were two things you took way out of context, for two I don't like you. I don't like the cut of your jib, I don't like your elitist attitude, I don't like your near constant knack for rubbing plenty of people the wrong way, I don't like your habitual challenging of other people's betting systems, and I don't like the way your mother uses too much teeth sometimes. Just make a knight in shining armor out of tin foil or something so you can say it's better than anyone we can produce there, Newton.

Thicker skin...LOL! coming from the guy not involved in any portion of the conversation, yet felt the need to jump in and be the hero.

I would have never brought those things up if you would have just kept to yourself, and let me and the guys have our conversation. Ludo, Scientist and I are fine...did you somehow think that I was picking on him. Did you have flashbacks of high school? Why did you even jump in? Did you want to get in on it and be the cool guy joining the mob?

Anyways, you can call a disagreemant an attack till you turn blue. I explained the type of bettor I was talking about, and it obviously does not apply to anyone in here.

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

You mean the part where Scientist made an exaggeration in which you would get banned because SPX was pissed off at you as though that kind of thing has ever happened here? Or where SPX said that MMA betting involves times where one must refrain from being afraid of a bet simply because of the line if the reasons are good enough? Dude grow some thicker skin, take the skirt off and quit being such a fucking girl already. It's fine and dandy to start attacking people's systems of betting but as soon as someone comes back at you it's all "oh I didn't do anything! Why are you all picking on Me! Stop coming to the rescue already!" Take that shit back to grade school.

As for where I was when that shit was going on, it's simple. For one they were two things you took way out of context, for two I don't like you. I don't like the cut of your jib, I don't like your elitist attitude, I don't like your near constant knack for rubbing plenty of people the wrong way, I don't like your habitual challenging of other people's betting systems, and I don't like the way your mother uses too much teeth sometimes. Just make a knight in shining armor out of tin foil or something so you can say it's better than anyone we can produce there, Newton.

Expound please. How many betting systems have I challenged? Do you even know how all this started? Or did you just see a disagreemant between sides, and jump in on the side that had the majority on it.

[SPX]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

Expound please. How many betting systems have I challenged? Do you even know how all this started? Or did you just see a disagreemant between sides, and jump in on the side that had the majority on it.

You clearly challenged any betting system in which betting heavy favorites on any kind of regular basis figured into it. At least own up to your own words and ideas.

[Ludo]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

You mean the part where Scientist made an exaggeration in which you would get banned because SPX was pissed off at you as though that kind of thing has ever happened here? Or where SPX said that MMA betting involves times where one must refrain from being afraid of a bet simply because of the line if the reasons are good enough? Dude grow some thicker skin, take the skirt off and quit being such a fucking girl already. It's fine and dandy to start attacking people's systems of betting but as soon as someone comes back at you it's all "oh I didn't do anything! Why are you all picking on Me! Stop coming to the rescue already!" Take that shit back to grade school.

As for where I was when that shit was going on, it's simple. For one they were two things you took way out of context, for two I don't like you. I don't like the cut of your jib, I don't like your elitist attitude, I don't like your near constant knack for rubbing plenty of people the wrong way, I don't like your habitual challenging of other people's betting systems, and I don't like the way your mother uses too much teeth sometimes. Just make a knight in shining armor out of tin foil or something so you can say it's better than anyone we can produce there, Newton.

Thicker skin...LOL! coming from the guy not involved in any portion of the conversation, yet felt the need to jump in and be the hero.

I would have never brought those things up if you would have just kept to yourself, and let me and the guys have our conversation. Ludo, Scientist and I are fine...did you somehow think that I was picking on him. Did you have flashbacks of high school? Why did you even jump in? Did you want to get in on it and be the cool guy joining the mob?

Anyways, you can call a disagreemant an attack till you turn blue. I explained the type of bettor I was talking about, and it obviously does not apply to anyone in here.

There's your answer, Newton. I didn't jump in to save anything or anybody. I just don't like you. You know, this whole highschool thing sounds oddly familiar. Yeah if I remember rightly that was really all you had the last time we got into it back when we were giving you some first day shit about the similarities between you and southbaysurf. Maybe since you don't have to worry about a career you can spend some time coming up with new material when your not discovering the new energy source to replace Foreign Oil.

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

Expound please. How many betting systems have I challenged? Do you even know how all this started? Or did you just see a disagreemant between sides, and jump in on the side that had the majority on it.

You clearly challenged any betting system in which betting heavy favorites on any kind of regular basis figured into it. At least own up to your own words and ideas.

OK, so that is one betting sysytem that everyone in here says they do not use....So the million dollar question is...What is the problem?

SPX, that is why I posted it. I own up to the challenge of the one system.

This is really getting weird.

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

You mean the part where Scientist made an exaggeration in which you would get banned because SPX was pissed off at you as though that kind of thing has ever happened here? Or where SPX said that MMA betting involves times where one must refrain from being afraid of a bet simply because of the line if the reasons are good enough? Dude grow some thicker skin, take the skirt off and quit being such a fucking girl already. It's fine and dandy to start attacking people's systems of betting but as soon as someone comes back at you it's all "oh I didn't do anything! Why are you all picking on Me! Stop coming to the rescue already!" Take that shit back to grade school.

As for where I was when that shit was going on, it's simple. For one they were two things you took way out of context, for two I don't like you. I don't like the cut of your jib, I don't like your elitist attitude, I don't like your near constant knack for rubbing plenty of people the wrong way, I don't like your habitual challenging of other people's betting systems, and I don't like the way your mother uses too much teeth sometimes. Just make a knight in shining armor out of tin foil or something so you can say it's better than anyone we can produce there, Newton.

Thicker skin...LOL! coming from the guy not involved in any portion of the conversation, yet felt the need to jump in and be the hero.

I would have never brought those things up if you would have just kept to yourself, and let me and the guys have our conversation. Ludo, Scientist and I are fine...did you somehow think that I was picking on him. Did you have flashbacks of high school? Why did you even jump in? Did you want to get in on it and be the cool guy joining the mob?

Anyways, you can call a disagreemant an attack till you turn blue. I explained the type of bettor I was talking about, and it obviously does not apply to anyone in here.

There's your answer, Newton. I didn't jump in to save anything or anybody. I just don't like you. You know, this whole highschool thing sounds oddly familiar. Yeah if I remember rightly that was really all you had the last time we got into it back when we were giving you some first day shit about the similarities between you and southbaysurf. Maybe since you don't have to worry about a career you can spend some time coming up with new material when your not discovering the new energy source to replace Foreign Oil.

Dude, you are scary. You ever seen the movie One hour photo? As for the school stuff...go read your above post. You know, the one where you bring up grade school.

At least I now know where it stems from...the infamous Southbay incident...And I need thicker skin?

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

You mean the part where Scientist made an exaggeration in which you would get banned because SPX was pissed off at you as though that kind of thing has ever happened here? Or where SPX said that MMA betting involves times where one must refrain from being afraid of a bet simply because of the line if the reasons are good enough? Dude grow some thicker skin, take the skirt off and quit being such a fucking girl already. It's fine and dandy to start attacking people's systems of betting but as soon as someone comes back at you it's all "oh I didn't do anything! Why are you all picking on Me! Stop coming to the rescue already!" Take that shit back to grade school.

As for where I was when that shit was going on, it's simple. For one they were two things you took way out of context, for two I don't like you. I don't like the cut of your jib, I don't like your elitist attitude, I don't like your near constant knack for rubbing plenty of people the wrong way, I don't like your habitual challenging of other people's betting systems, and I don't like the way your mother uses too much teeth sometimes. Just make a knight in shining armor out of tin foil or something so you can say it's better than anyone we can produce there, Newton.

Thicker skin...LOL! coming from the guy not involved in any portion of the conversation, yet felt the need to jump in and be the hero.

I would have never brought those things up if you would have just kept to yourself, and let me and the guys have our conversation. Ludo, Scientist and I are fine...did you somehow think that I was picking on him. Did you have flashbacks of high school? Why did you even jump in? Did you want to get in on it and be the cool guy joining the mob?

Anyways, you can call a disagreemant an attack till you turn blue. I explained the type of bettor I was talking about, and it obviously does not apply to anyone in here.

There's your answer, Newton. I didn't jump in to save anything or anybody. I just don't like you. You know, this whole highschool thing sounds oddly familiar. Yeah if I remember rightly that was really all you had the last time we got into it back when we were giving you some first day shit about the similarities between you and southbaysurf. Maybe since you don't have to worry about a career you can spend some time coming up with new material when your not discovering the new energy source to replace Foreign Oil.

LOL! You would if you actually knew me. First off, I think your politics are close to mine, because you like to use the word elitist. So I would guess you are a conservative guy. Second, I love to hang around hothead tough guy types. You know, the guys that are ready to throw down when things are not going their way.

[Ludo]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

So because I remember two instances of the same thing I'm some kind of thriller villain? Your so awkward you make Oranges fit in. See how ridiculous that sounds? You do need thicker skin seeing as you cry wolf every time someone doesn't agree with what your saying. What I'd like to know is where this "highschool" theme of yours stems from. Did you see it in One Hour Photo or did you just hear it somewhere and think you could make all your quips successful by riding it like the midnight express?

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

So because I remember two instances of the same thing I'm some kind of thriller villain? Your so awkward you make Oranges fit in. See how ridiculous that sounds? You do need thicker skin seeing as you cry wolf every time someone doesn't agree with what your saying. What I'd like to know is where this "highschool" theme of yours stems from. Did you see it in One Hour Photo or did you just hear it somewhere and think you could make all your quips successful by riding it like the midnight express?

Actually I took it from your post right before mine where you mentioned school. Sorry, do you get a royalty.

And yea, it is weird that you have been flaming inside from day one because your stupid SBS jokes were pushed back at you. That is some serious inner rage. Let it out Ludo, just let it out. When you hold it in, it kills you slowly.

This is where you come back with me needing thicker skin or some random mom joke. Or maybe you can talk about how I constantly attack a betting system that no one in here uses.

[SPX]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

OK, so that is one betting sysytem that everyone in here says they do not use....So the million dollar question is...What is the problem?

SPX, that is why I posted it. I own up to the challenge of the one system.

This is really getting weird.

Well if you remember it all stemmed from own practice of sometimes betting big favorites. I think I replied to a post that edman made where I talked about finding good bets around -500.

Or something like that. . .

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

OK, so that is one betting sysytem that everyone in here says they do not use....So the million dollar question is...What is the problem?

SPX, that is why I posted it. I own up to the challenge of the one system.

This is really getting weird.

Well if you remember it all stemmed from own practice of sometimes betting big favorites. I think I replied to a post that edman made where I talked about finding good bets around -500.

Or something like that. . .

Actually, I am pretty sure it began with me and Scientist. And then escalated when people started jumping in. I still am not sure why some are defensive over a system that they do not use.

i have heard many of you say that you do not think just betting dogs is a good system....are you attacking that system?

[Ludo]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

LOL! You would if you actually knew me. First off, I think your politics are close to mine, because you like to use the word elitist. So I would guess you are a conservative guy. Second, I love to hang around hothead tough guy types. You know, the guys that are ready to throw down when things are not going their way.

Conservative isn't something I would classify Myself as but thats fine. I'm not sure what the connection between us is concerning the word elitist other than the fact that I've used that word to describe you a few times now. What a coincidence. I always liked to laugh at the guys who would take any joke so literally that they would think it were a personal attack against them. You squirrelly types are pretty funny when ya'll get going.

[Mr. IWS]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

C'mon yall, for real. Lets just drop it.

[SPX]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

i have heard many of you say that you do not think just betting dogs is a good system....are you attacking that system?

I would certainly say that I think it's a foolish way to play because you're passing up so many good opportunities. But I do know someone--one of the very first people to give me some guidance in the early phases of my betting career--who mostly just plays dogs, and he makes money. So I don't hate on it. I realize that that's his comfort zone and, as Scientist said, this game is as much mental/emotional as it is mathematical and we have to play in a way that takes into account our own personal tendencies.

With that said, I think he (my acquaintance) would make more money if he broadened his horizons a bit.

[sbjj]

Re: UFC 121 Lesnar vs Velasquez

SPX, this where the problem is I believe. Many in here think that my way of not ever betting heavy faves. is not correct. and you may think that me putting such a low limit on the line is plain silly. And that is fine. I do not look at that as an attack. it is a simple disagreemnet. Scientists and I are actually not that far off from one another when it comes to limits.

I personally do not think betting anything @ -400 or higher ever is a good idea. but that is my opinion, it is not an attack. I also believe those who make those bets frequently have a severely flawed system. Once again, it is just an opinion. I bring up certain things because I have been doing this for quite awhile, maybe from now on, i will refrain from that sort of talk.

But seriously, when someone disagrees with your position they are not attacking you. Bringing persoanl stuff up and name calling is attacking.